[00:00:06]
[1. Call meeting to order.]
REGULAR SCHEDULED, SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL MEETING.WE HAVE A QUORUM OF COUNCIL HERE.
I AM GREG GLOVER, MAYOR PRO TEM.
I AM SITTING IN PLACE OF MAYOR MASON, WHO SENDS HIS REGARDS FROM VACATION.
I WOULD LIKE TO EXTEND THE WARM WELCOME TO OUR DEDICATED CITY STAFF, OUR RESIDENTS HERE WITH US IN THE TUR CANDIDATE ROOM, AND OUR CITIZENS VIEWING ONLINE.
BEFORE WE PROCEED, I WANT TO REMIND EVERYONE THAT THIS IS AN OFFICIAL MEETING AND OPEN CARRY A FIREARM TO STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
WE WILL HAVE THE INVOCATION FROM THE, FROM PASTOR JOSH PRINCE FROM THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH HERE IN THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL.
AND THEN AFTER THAT, WE WILL HAVE COUNCIL MEMBER GERALD MALONE, LEAD US IN PLEDGES.
FATHER GOD, WE THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS DAY THAT YOU'VE GIVEN US.
AND LORD, WE THANK YOU THAT WE CAN LEAN ON YOU AND TRUST IN YOU.
FATHER, THAT YOUR NAME IS ABOVE ALL NAMES.
FATHER, YOU ARE THE KING OF KINGS AND THE LORD OF LORDS.
AND GOD 'CAUSE OF YOUR GREAT LOVE FOR US, YOU SET YOUR ONE AND ONLY SON JESUS TO THIS WORLD, GOD, TO TAKE ON OUR BURDEN, OUR SIN, OUR SHAME, SO THAT WE MIGHT WALK IN FREEDOM AND REDEMPTION AND GRACE AND IN CONFIDENCE.
WE THANK YOU THAT HE IS THE WAY AND THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE.
AND LORD, I PRAY THAT, UH, GOD'S CITY, UH, THIS CITY WOULD BE REACHED BY THAT MESSAGE AND THAT TRUTH ABOVE ALL.
AND GOD, I I DO PRAY OVER THE PROCEEDINGS TONIGHT.
I THANK YOU FOR THIS COUNCIL, UH, LORD, FOR THEIR HEART AND LOVE FOR THE CITY, THEIR DESIRE TO SEE THE CITY THRIVE, UH, TO SEE THE CITY SAFE, AND, UH, FATHER, TO SUBMIT TO YOU, UH, GOD, TO ALLOW PRAYER TO BE PART OF THIS PROCESS.
SO, LORD, WE THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THAT.
AND I PRAY THAT YOU WOULD GIVE THEM CONTINUED WISDOM AND GUIDANCE AND DISCERNMENT, THE DECISIONS THAT LIE AHEAD OF THEM.
GOD, WE THANK YOU FOR THE CELEBRATION HAPPENING IN THE LOBBY.
NOW, GOD, WE THANK YOU FOR OUR FIRST RESPONDERS, GOD, THAT, UH, EACH AND EVERY DAY THEY PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE.
GOD, THEY PUT THEIR LIVES ON HOLD FOR US.
LORD, WE THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE SACRIFICES THEY MAKE.
HELP US TO SUPPORT THEM AND ENCOURAGE THEM.
GOD HELP US TO, UH, VALUE THEM AND, AND DO ALL THAT WE CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY FEEL, UH, LOVED AND APPRECIATED.
UH, GOD, WE PRAY FOR THEIR SAFETY.
I THANK YOU FOR, UH, THESE WOMEN STANDING BEHIND ME, LORD, FOR FOR THEIR INCREDIBLE ACTS OF VALOR AND SERVICE.
AND, UH, LORD, HOW, UH, LORD, THEY, UH, THEY CARED FOR US.
GOD CARED FOR NAMES THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW, UH, THAT WE MIGHT BE FREE AND PROTECTED.
LORD, I I THANK YOU FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONTINUING TO SERVE.
UH, LORD WOULD YOU CONTINUE TO PROTECT THEM AS WELL.
AND LORD, I JUST PRAY BLESSINGS OVER THE CITY.
A GOD, WE THANK YOU SO MUCH, UH, LORD, THAT WE GET TO CARE FOR ONE ANOTHER.
A GOD THAT WE BE, WE GET TO BE NEIGHBORS TO ONE ANOTHER, LORD, THAT IS A HIGH RESPONSIBILITY.
AND SO, LORD, HELP US TO VALUE ONE ANOTHER.
GOD HELP US TO SEE THE NEEDS AROUND US AND MEET THEM.
GOD HELP US TO OFFER WORDS OF SUPPORT AND ENCOURAGEMENT WHEN CRITICISM LINGERS.
AND FATHER, WOULD YOU BE GLORIFIED? GOD, I THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE CHURCHES THAT SERVE THIS CITY.
I PRAY THAT YOU WOULD GROW THEM AND EXPAND THEM, AND LORD, THAT WE WOULD BE LIKES TO THIS COMMUNITY.
GOD, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR TONIGHT.
THANK YOU FOR THE DECISIONS THAT LIE AHEAD.
LORD, MAY YOU BE GLORIFIED IN.
EVERYONE, PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE.
FIRST, THE AMERICAN FLAG PLEDGE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN REPUBLIC, WHICH STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVIDUAL WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR THE TEXAS ONLY.
THE TEXAS FLAG, OUR PREJUDICES TO BE TEXAS, ONE STATE UNDER, UNDER GOD, ONE INDIVIDUAL.
[a. Present a Proclamation designating June 12, 2026 as Womens Veteran's Day in Cedar Hill.]
ON TO PRESENTATIONS.THIS IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR, PRESENT A PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING JUNE 12TH, 2026 AS WOMAN'S VETERAN DAY IN CEDAR HILL, TEXAS.
AND THIS WILL BE READ BY, PRESENTED BY OUR COUNCIL MEMBER PATTY BUS HART.
IT'S MY PLEASURE TO WELCOME THESE LADIES HERE AS, UH, DISABLED AMERICAN VETERAN, UH, WOMEN IN THE STATE OF TEXAS.
AND I HAVE A PROCLAMATION FROM THE MAYOR, FROM THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, WHEREAS CEDAR HILL
[00:05:01]
SALUTES AND REMEMBERS THE MANY AMERICAN FEMALE VETERANS WHO COURAGEOUSLY AND HONORABLY SERVE IN THE MILITARY ON BEHALF OF THE NATION.AND WHEREAS WOMEN HAVE FORMALLY BEEN PART OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE ARMY NURSE CORPS IN 19 0 1, BUT HAVE PROUDLY SERVED ALONGSIDE AND SUPPORTED OUR NATION'S MILITARY SINCE THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION.
AND WHEREAS ON JUNE 9TH, 2017, THE TEXAS STATE LEGISLATURE OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED JUNE 12TH AS WOMEN'S VETERANS DAY SIGNED INTO LAW BY GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT.
AND WHEREAS ON THIS DAY, WE COMMEMORATE THE FEARLESS SERVICE OF WOMEN WHO HAVE SERVED OUR NATION IN THE ARMED FORCES AND WE HONOR OUR FEMALE VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES FOR THEIR REMARKABLE SACRIFICES AND OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO OUR NATION.
NOW THEREFORE, STEVE MASON, MAYOR OF CEDAR HILL DOES HONORABLY FOR DECLARE JUNE 12TH, 2026 AS WOMEN'S VETERANS DAY IN THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL, UH, TEXAS.
AND WE ENCOURAGE ALL CITIZENS TO RECOGNIZE THE COURAGE AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF GENERATIONS OF AMERICAN SERVICE WOMEN AND THEIR FAMILIES WHO HAVE PROUDLY SERVED OUR GREAT STATE AND NATION DOING THEIR PART TO PROTECT OUR LAND PEOPLE, STUDENTS, AND LEGACY.
IN WITNESS ERA WHEREOF, HE HAS HERE UNTO SET HIS HAND AND HAS CALLED THE SEAL OF THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS TO BE AFFIXED ON THIS NINTH DAY OF JUNE, 2026.
AND IT'S SIGNED BY OUR MAYOR STEVEN MASON.
I AM THE CO-CHAIR FOR OUR DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS CHAPTER TWO 40 CEDAR HILL, TEXAS.
THIS THURSDAY, 11 JUNE FROM 10:00 AM TO 2:00 PM WE WILL HOST AN EVENT TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND TO REMEMBER ALL OF OUR WOMEN VETERANS FOR THEIR SERVICE THAT THEY HAVE DONE THROUGHOUT THE MILITARY AS WELL AS IN THEIR COMMUNITIES CURRENTLY.
WE WANT THEM TO KNOW THAT THEY'RE NOT FORGOTTEN.
WE WANT THEM TO KNOW THAT WE REMEMBER WHAT THEY'VE DONE AND THEIR SACRIFICES.
SO WE'RE MAKING THIS DAY IMPORTANT FOR THEM, AND WE'RE ASKING THEM TO COME OUT AND WE'RE GOING TO IDENTIFY THEM BY THEIR CAMOUFLAGE ATTIRE, ALLOW THEM THE OPPORTUNITY TO STRUT THEIR STUFF AND LET US KNOW WHAT INSPIRED THEIR OUTFIT.
ALSO, WE'RE GONNA HAVE SOME OTHER EVENTS WHERE WE'RE GONNA ALLOW THEM TO HAVE A FIRE PIT SIMULATOR, WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO COME UP TO THE FIRE PIT AND TELL US WHAT THEY'VE OVERCOME THROUGHOUT THEIR MILITARY OR EVEN CURRENTLY WHAT THEY'VE OVERCOME, AND DROP THAT IN THE SIMULATED FIRE PIT SO THAT THEY CAN REMEMBER IT NO MORE.
AND MOVING ON TO BIGGER AND BETTER THINGS.
[b. Present a Proclamation designating June 13, 2026 as Juneteenth Celebration Day in Cedar Hill.]
IS AGENDA ITEM FOUR B.PRESENT A PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING JUNE 13TH, 2026 AS JUNETEENTH CELEBRATION DAY IN CEDAR HILL, TEXAS.
AND THIS WILL BE PRESENTED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GERALD MALONE.
GOOD EVENING PROCLAMATION, OFFICE OF THE MAYOR.
WHERE IS PRESIDENT ABRAHAM LINCOLN ISSUED THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION ON JANUARY 1ST, 1863.
AND WHEREAS ALTHOUGH RUMORS OF FREEDOM FOR SLAVES WERE WIDESPREAD, ACTUAL EMANCIPATION DID NOT COME UNTIL THE CIVIL WAR ENDED TWO HALF YEARS LATER WHEN GENERAL GORDON GRANGER RODE INTO GALVESTON, TEXAS ISSUING THE GENERAL ORDINARY NUMBER THREE ON JUNE 19TH, 1865.
AND WHEREAS AS THE NEWS SPREAD THOUSANDS FLOODED THE STREETS OF GALVESTON REJOICING IN THEIR NEWFOUND FREEDOM AND CELEBRATING WITH SONG DANCE PRAYERS CREATING THE DAY, WE NOW CELEBRATE AS JUNETEENTH TO COMMEMORATE AFRICAN AMERICAN FREEDOM.
AND WHEREAS TODAY, THESE SAME CELEBRATIONS ARE OUR OPPORTUNITY TO REMEMBER THE PAST,
[00:10:02]
RECOGNIZING THE SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTIONS OF AFRICAN AMERICAN CELEBR, CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSITY AND REINFORCE OUR HOPE FOR THE FUTURE.AND WHEREAS THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL RECOGNIZES THAT DIVERSE COMMUNITY FOUNDED ON SHARED VALUES AND COMMUNITY SPIRIT IS OUR STRENGTH AND OPPORTUNITY FOR THE FUTURE.
AND WHEREAS THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL IS PLEASED TO JOIN THE CITY'S OF DUNCANVILLE, THE SOTO, AND LANCASTER IN THE BEST SOUTHWEST CELEBRATION OF JUNETEENTH AND RECOGNITION OF OUR RICH DIVERSITY.
NOW, THEREFORE, I STEVE MASON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS, HAS DUE BY HEREBY PROCLAIMED JUNE 13TH, 2026 AS JUNETEENTH CELEBRATION DAY IN THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS.
I URGE THAT ALL OF OUR CITIZENS TO CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSITY, TO RECOGNIZE THE STRENGTH OF A RICH CULTURE AND EXPERIENCE THE AFRICAN AMERICAN HERITAGE.
THIS CELEBRATION ACKNOWLEDGES THE HISTORY OF AN IMPORTANT PART OF AMERICAN SOCIETY AND HELPS UNIFY OUR CITY AND OUR NATION AS A WHOLE.
THE 2026 BEST SOUTHWEST JUNETEENTH CELEBRATION WILL BE HELD SATURDAY, JUNE 13TH, 2026 FROM 11:00 AM TO 10:00 PM AT THE LANCASTER COMMUNITY PARK, 1700 VETERANS MEMORIAL PARKWAY, LANCASTER, TEXAS 7 5 1 3 4.
AND WITNESS, THEREFORE, I HAVE HEARING TO SET MY HAND AND HAVE CAUSED A SEAL OF THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS TO BE AFFIXED THIS NINTH DAY OF JUNE, 2026.
I JUST WANTED TO JUST HIGHLIGHT THE, UH, FEATURE ARTIST, UM, THAT WILL BE AT THE LANCASTER COMMUNITY CENTER.
UM, THIS UPCOMING SATURDAY, WE WILL HAVE, UH, UH, EM AND ZYDECO MASTERS.
WE WILL HAVE, UH, UH, UH, CHIEF D DONDRE, LECRAE, AND MARIO.
SO PLEASE GO, UH, CHECK OUT THE, THE ARTISTS, UH, THAT ARE SCHEDULED, UH, TO PERFORM.
ANYONE KNOW A MARIO SONG? MARIO LYRICS? ANYONE? NO.
I THOUGHT, THOUGHT WE HAD THE COUNCIL MEMBER READY TO SING.
NEXT UP IS ITEM FOUR D, PRESENT, EXCUSE ME,
[c. Badge pinning and administering Oaths of Office to newly promoted fire personnel. ]
FOUR C.THIS IS A BADGE PENDING AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF OATS OF OFFICE TO THE NEWLY PROMOTED FIRE PERSONNEL.
AND WE HAVE CHIEF HARRISON COMING UP AND WE TURN IT OVER TO YOU, SIR.
MAYOR TRO TIM AND CITY COUNCIL AND OUR VISITORS THAT ARE HERE TO SUPPORT OUR MEMBERS TONIGHT.
UH, THIS IS A PRIVILEGE ALWAYS TO RECOGNIZE OUR MEMBERS AS THEY PROMOTE UP THROUGH THE ORGANIZATION.
UM, EACH ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS HAS SHOWN THE DEDICATION AND THE HARD WORK AND THE COMMITMENT TO ACHIEVE, UH, THIS BADGE PENDING TONIGHT FOR THIS CEREMONY.
UH, WE'RE GONNA START OFF TONIGHT WITH, UM, OUR BADGE PENDING FOR RYAN VALENCIA.
GIFFORD, IF YOU CAN COME DOWN PLEASE, AND IF YOU'LL ALLOW YEAH, IF YOU'LL ALLOW ME TO SAY A FEW THINGS ABOUT HIM BEFORE WE SWEAR HIM ON.
UM, RYAN HAS BEEN PROMOTED TO DRIVER ENGINEER RYAN JOINED OUR CEDAR HILL FIRE DEPARTMENT IN 2023 AND HAS QUICKLY ESTABLISHED HIMSELF AS A VALUABLE MEMBER OF THIS ORGANIZATION.
UM, HE HAS EARNED THE HIGHEST SCORE ON THE DRIVER ENGINEER PROMOTIONAL EXAM THAT WAS JUST, UH, ADMINISTERED THIS APRIL.
UM, THEREFORE HE, UH, STANDS BEFORE US TO RECEIVE THIS, UH, RECOGNITION TONIGHT.
UM, HE'S BEEN AN EXCELLENT FIREFIGHTER AND BROUGHT A LOT OF, UH, THAT STRONG WORK ETHIC AS HE TAKES CARE OF THE PATIENTS ON THE AMBULANCE AND AS HE AS A FIREFIGHTER ON THE, ON THE FIRETRUCK.
BUT I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT YOU DO AS A DRIVER OF THE FIRETRUCK AND THE LEADERSHIP THAT YOU'LL CONTINUE TO PROVIDE FOR OUR ORGANIZATION.
SO WITH THAT, WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN.
PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AFTER ME.
DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT I'LL FAITHFULLY EXECUTE THE DUTIES THAT I FAITHFULLY CEDAR FIRE DEPARTMENT DRIVER ENGINEER AND WILL THE BEST OF MY ABILITY, THE BEST MY PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND, PROTECT AND THE CONSTITUTION LAWS OF UNITED STATES
[00:15:01]
CONSTITUTION OF.AND SO I WOULD LIKE TO INVITE, UH, RYAN'S FAMILY DOWN, HIS MOM, TARA AND HIS DAD RYAN, WHO WOULD BE PERFORMING THE BADGE OPINION.
WE LIKE TO GET A PICTURE WITH YOU.
NEXT, I WOULD LIKE TO INVITE CHRIS HOLCOMB TO JOIN ME UP FRONT.
LET ME, UH, SAY A FEW WORDS ABOUT CHRIS HERE.
SO HE JOINED OUR FIRE DEPARTMENT IN 2015 AS A FIREFIGHTER, AND HE HAS WORKED HIS WAY UP THROUGH THE RANKS TO DRIVER ENGINEER.
UH, DURING THAT TIME WHILE SERVING IN THE OPERATIONS, HE PUT IN A LOT OF EXTRA EFFORT TO OBTAIN THE CERTIFICATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO TAKE ON THE NEW ROLE AS INSPECTOR IN THE FIRE MARSHALS DIVISION.
UH, CHRIS HAS BEEN A TREMENDOUS ASSET, NOT ONLY, UH, IN THE FIREFIGHTER RANKS AND THE DRIVER ENGINEER RANKS, AND NOW AS AN INSPECTOR WORKING IN THE FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION AS ONE OF OUR, UH, LAUGHS, LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY TEAM MEMBERS WHO TRAVELS AROUND TO OUR SCHOOLS AND OTHER PLACES IN THE STATE TO TEACH FIRE SAFETY TO OUR CHILDREN.
UM, I'M SO EXCITED ABOUT HIM TAKING THIS POSITION AND I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT HE DOES WITH THIS.
UM, LIKE I SAID, I WILL STAY OUTTA YOUR WAY AND LET YOU FLY 'CAUSE YOU'RE GONNA DO GREAT THINGS.
UM, CHRIS IS GONNA BE, UH, SWORN IN RIGHT NOW AND THEN WE'LL INVITE HIS FAMILY DOWN.
I, I DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR, SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT I'LL FAITHFULLY THE FAITHFULLY OF THE OFFICE OF FIRE INSPECTOR, THE OFFICE OF FIRE INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF TEXAS.
THE CITY OF TEXAS, AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY, TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY, PRESERVE, PROTECT, AND DEFEND, PRESERVE, PROTECT, AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS OF UNITED STATES, CONSTITUTIONAL UNITED STATES AND STATES.
SO I'D LIKE TO INVITE CHRIS'S FAMILY DOWN AND IT'LL BE PINNED BY HIS WIFE ASHLEY, AND HIS CHILDREN BY SIDE.
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST, I WOULD, UH, LIKE TO INVITE MS. TAMMY COOPER DOWN TO THE FRONT, PLEASE.
SHE BROUGHT A CROWD WITH HER TONIGHT,
SHE TOLD ME IT WAS JUST GONNA BE A FEW PEOPLE.
UM, I WANNA SAY A FEW WORDS ABOUT TAMMY AS WELL BEFORE WE SWEAR IN.
SHE JOINED, UH, THE CEDAR HILL FIRE DEPARTMENT IN 2018 AFTER A SUCCESSFUL CAREER WITH THE CEDAR HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT.
AND, UH, I'M TELLING YOU, WE WERE EXCITED WHEN WE
[00:20:01]
STOLE HER AWAY FROM THEM.UM, SINCE JOINING OUR TEAM, SHE HAS SERVED AS THE FIRE INSPECTOR, FIRE INVESTIGATOR, AND MOST RECENTLY AFTER THE DEPARTURE AND RETIREMENT OF CHIEF, UH, REGINALD ALEXANDER, SHE STEPPED IN AS THE ACTON FIRE MARSHAL.
UM, THROUGHOUT THIS TIME ON OUR DEPARTMENT, UH, SHE HAS CONSISTENTLY DEMONSTRATED HER PROFESSIONALISM, HER WORK ETHIC, HER LEADERSHIP, AND A STRONG, STRONG COMMITMENT TO PUBLIC SAFETY.
UH, SHE HAS DEFINITELY EARNED THIS OPPORTUNITY AND I AM CONFIDENT SHE WILL CONTINUE TO DO GREAT THINGS.
AS OUR NEW FIRE MARSHAL RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND A I TAMMY COOPER.
TAMMY COOPER DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR.
SO I'LL, THANKFULLY THE THANK THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL THE OF CEDAR, THE BEST, BEST, PROTECT AND DEFEND, PROTECT THE CONSTITU OF UNITED STATES, CONSTITU UNITED STATES, UH, WITH THIS PROMOTION, MS. TAMMY COOPER AS IT'S CHIEF, THE RANK OF OFFICER, AND IS NOW HEREBY KNOWN AS CHIEF TAMMY COOPER CHIEF, BE PINNED BY, UH, ROSE BROWN.
IT IS HARD TO CLOSE SOMETIMES.
THAT CONCLUDES OUR OPINION CEREMONY.
I APPRECIATE, UH, THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT HERE IN FRONT OF YOU AND ALL OF HER FRIENDS, SO THANK YOU.
UH, BEFORE WE MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO DON'T LIVE IN CEDAR HILL, THIS IS CEDAR HILL.
AND ON BEHALF OF OUR MAYOR, STEVE MASON AND THE ENTIRETY OF OUR COUNCIL, WE WANNA SAY CONGRATULATIONS TO THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE BEEN PROMOTED.
AND THIS IS WHAT MAKES CEDAR HILL SPECIAL.
THE NEXT ITEM IS CITIZEN FORUM.
WHERE Y'ALL GOING
WHILE OUR GUESTS ARE GOING TO CELEBRATE THEIR PROMOTIONS OUTSIDE WITH CHARCUTERIE, UM, JUST WANT TO MENTION THAT ITEM FOUR D WILL BE POSTPONED UNTIL JUNE 23RD.
I HOPE THEY SAVED SOME OF THAT CHARCUTERIE.
[5. Citizens Forum/Public Comments. Citizens wishing to speak during this time should submit a Speaker Request Form to the City Secretary before the meeting begins. Public comments may also be submitted online at: cedarhilltx.com/publiccomment. All public comments submitted online by 3pm on City Council meeting dates will be distributed to the City Council and entered into record. ]
THE NEXT ITEM IS CITIZEN FORUM AGENDA ITEM FIVE.THIS GIVES ANYONE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK DIRECTLY TO COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT LISTED
[00:25:01]
ON THE AGENDA.BEFORE WE START, I DO WANNA MAKE A QUICK NOTE, A REMINDER THAT REGARDING TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, BECAUSE THESE ITEMS AREN'T FORMALLY POSTED ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, THIS COUNCIL IS LEGALLY RESTRICTED FROM DELIBERATING ON FROM THE DIOCESE.
EACH SPEAKER WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO ADDRESS COUNCIL, AND WE JUST HAVE THE ONE.
TONIGHT WE HAVE MR. PHILLIP BAITZ OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS, AND HIS TOPIC IS TOURISM CALLING CITY HALL AND BICENTENNIAL AND A HALF.
HOW ABOUT YOU, SIR? UH, BEFORE I START, MAYOR, IF IT EVER GETS TOO ROWDY, YOU DON'T CALL THE POLICE, YOU CALL THE SHERIFF THAT WAY YOUR HANDS WERE CLEAN OF ANYTHING.
AND QUITE SOME TIME, 50 SOMETHING YEARS AGO, I WITNESSED THAT, THAT THE MAYOR DID CALL THE SHERIFF.
SO I'M PHILLIP SI LIVE AT 1130 NORTH CEDAR HILL ROAD, AND, UH, I'M CONCERNED THAT, UH, I DON'T, I CHECKED ON THE CITY HALL WEBSITE, CITY WEBSITE, LOOKING FOR A BICENTENNIAL AND A HALF CELEBRATION.
BACK IN THE SEVENTIES WHEN IT WAS THE, UH, 200 CELEBRATION, THEY HAD ONE HERE AROUND THE CITY HALL, WHICH IS NOW BABES.
AND I THINK WE MISSED SOMETHING WHEN YOU HAVE TO GO 16 MILES TO CELEBRATE JUNETEENTH.
JUNETEENTH USED TO BE CELEBRATED HERE IN CEDAR HILL.
AND IN A SENSE, I WAS A PARTICIPANT BECAUSE I MADE DONATIONS WITH MY BROTHER TO, UH, HELP THESE PEOPLE HAVE THE CELEBRATION.
AND A LOT OF THESE THINGS JUST CAN HAPPEN JUST BY WITH FOOD TRUCKS AND EVERYTHING ELSE.
AND I WENT TO THE NATIONAL POKER FESTIVAL AND I KNOW WHAT I SPENT, I WAS THERE TWO DAYS AND I KNOW WHAT IT BRINGS IN.
AND I KNOW Y'ALL WENT TO MISSOURI LOOKING FOR WAYS TO ENHANCE DIFFERENT THINGS HERE.
AND THE THINGS THAT I SAW IN MISSOURI, THE ONLY THING THAT I DIDN'T SEE THAT WE, THE THING THAT WE DON'T HAVE HERE WOULD BE FUN, FUN MOUNTAIN.
IT WAS CALLED ELLEN'S FAIRWAY.
BUT EVERYTHING ELSE THAT Y'ALL LOOKED AT, WE'VE GOT A GOLF COURSE EVEN THOUGH IT'S IN ANOTHER CITY, BUT I KNOW WHAT I SPENT THERE.
IT'S WHERE PEOPLE CAN GET TOGETHER.
AND ON ELECTION DAY, THE LAST DAY OF ELECTION, I WALKED FROM MY HOUSE TO, UH, THE RECREATION CENTER WAS 3.1 MILES.
AND THERE WERE A LOT OF THINGS THAT I SAW IN CEDAR HILL THAT YOU PROBABLY DON'T SEE IF YOU WOULD'VE DRIVEN.
BUT ONE OF THE LAST THINGS I WANT TO SAY IS I CALLED THE CITY HALL YESTERDAY AT ABOUT 1230 AND, AND I'VE CALLED THEM BEFORE AT THE SAME NUMBER AND IT WAS THE TOURISM NUMBER.
AND PREVIOUSLY NO ONE'S EVER CALLED ME BACK FROM THE TOURISM THING.
NO ONE'S CALLED ME BACK FROM YESTERDAY FROM 1236.
AND I LEFT A MESSAGE, I DON'T KNOW IF THE SYSTEM'S NOT WORKING OR WHATEVER, BUT I WAS WANTING TO ASK ABOUT, UH, IF THEY WERE GONNA HAVE A BICENTENNIAL AND A HALF CELEBRATION.
AND I THINK THAT Y'ALL SHOULD CONSIDER THAT BECAUSE IT'S LIKE VOTING.
YOU CAN VOTE, YOU CAN WALK TO YOUR POLLING PLACES.
AND ALSO I DID A, I WAS GONNA WALK TO ALL THE POLLING PLACES ON ELECTION DAY AND IT WAS LIKE 20 MILES AND I GOT UP TOO LATE AND IT JUST WAS NOT, I JUST PASSED IT.
BUT I THINK YOU LOSE A LOT WHEN YOU DON'T HAVE IT HERE IN TOWN WHERE YOU CAN JUST GO RIGHT TO IT AND THEN THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT THAT YOU HAVE, YOU SPEND THE MONEY IN YOUR OWN TOWN.
AND THAT IS THE ONLY ONE WE HAVE THIS EVENING.
[a. Case No. PD-688-2024 – Conduct a public hearing and consider an application for a change in zoning from “SF-7” (Single-Family Residential – 7,000 square-foot lots minimum) and “SF-22” (Single-Family Residential – 22,000 square-foot lots minimum) Districts to a Planned Development (PD) District for Single-Family Townhouses (Attached) on a property generally located on the east side N. Joe Wilson Road, approximately 700 feet to the north of the intersection of N. Joe Wilson Road and E. Belt Line Road, with the address being 208 N. Joe Wilson Road. Applicant: S. Gabriel Ekpo, New Home Sales Center, Representative: Philip Colwell, DC Texas Architecture, Property Owner: S. Gabriel Ekpo, New Home Sales Center]
PUBLIC HEARINGS.WE HAVE CASE NUMBER PD 6 8 8 2 0 2 4.
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM SF SEVEN, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 7,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS MINIMUM.
AND SF 22, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 22,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM SQUARE FOOT LOTS MINIMUM DISTRICTS TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSES ATTACHED ON THE PROPERTY.
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF, ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET TO THE NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD AND EAST BELTLINE ROAD.
WITH THE ADDRESS BEING 2 0 2 0 8 NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD, THE APPLICANT'S S GABRIEL EPO, NEW HOME SALES CENTER REPRESENTATIVE PHILLIP CALDWELL, DC TEXAS ARCHITECTURE PROPERTY OWNER S GABRIEL EPO, NEW HOME SALES CENTER.
HOW ARE YOU DIRECT YOURSELF? I'M DOING WELL.
[00:30:01]
MAYOR PROTI AND COUNCIL.OUR AGENDA ITEM FOR TONIGHT IS PD 6 8 8 20 24.
THIS SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET TO THE NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD IN EAST BELTLINE ROAD.
WITH THE ADDRESS BEING 2 0 8 NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD IS SHOWN IN THE MAP IN THE TOP LEFT, OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN YELLOW IN THE BOTTOM MAP, AND THE REQUEST IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM SF SEVEN AND SF 22 DISTRICTS TO A PD DISTRICT FOR TOWNHOUSES.
THESE IMAGES GIVE YOU A VIEW OF VANTAGE POINT FROM THE SOUTH AND FROM THE NORTH.
SO BRIEFLY, I'LL PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THIS REQUEST.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 3.51 ACRES AND IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED.
IT IS ZONED SF SEVEN AND SF 22 DISTRICTS WHERE TOWNHOUSES ARE NOT PERMITTED.
THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO A PD WITH TH OR TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT AS THE BASE ZONING TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWN TOWNHOUSES.
THE PD DISTRICT WOULD ESTABLISH TOWNHOUSES AS THE ONLY USE PERMITTED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND IT INCLUDES A PD CONCEPT PLAN THAT LAYS OUT THE TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT.
THIS LAYOUT CONSISTS OF 27 TOWNHOUSES, EACH TOWNHOUSE ON ITS OWN LOT, AND FIVE HOA LOTS.
EACH TOWNHOUSE WOULD HAVE TWO STORIES, THREE BEDROOMS, A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 1700 SQUARE FEET, PLUS AN ATTACHED TWO CAR GARAGE.
THE TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT WOULD INCLUDE VISITOR PARKING AND OPEN SPACE WITH AMENITIES.
AND FINALLY, THE INDIVIDUAL TOWNHOUSES ARE TO BE SOLD TO INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS AND ALL TOWNHOUSES SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO AN HOA.
THE EXISTING ZONING IN THE AREA SHOWN HERE ON THIS MAP, UH, GENERALLY TOWNHOUSES WOULD BE PERMITTED BY WRIGHT IN THE TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT OR TH THE MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT OR IN MATH.
AND WITHIN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, IT WOULD BE ALLOWED IN THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT, A PD IS USED AS A, AS A TOOL TO ALLOW THE CITY TO EVALUATE THE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS BEYOND THE STANDARD CODE REQUIREMENTS THAT COULD NOT BE ASSURED WITH THE STANDARD ZONING DISTRICT.
WE HAVE A FEW SLIDES THAT INCLUDE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT AND WHAT IS PROPOSED BY THE PD, THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BY THE APPLICANT.
I WILL HIGHLIGHT A FEW ITEMS AS WE GO THROUGH THE SLIDES.
AND SO FOR THE SAKE OF TIME, I WILL FOCUS ON THE BUILDING DESIGN.
AND SO FOR THE TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT OR TH THAT IS SILENT FOR THE PROPOSED PD STANDARDS BY THE APPLICANT, I'LL HIGHLIGHT A FEW THINGS.
THE FRONT ELEVATION OF EACH UNIT FOR BUILDING TYPE A SHALL INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS.
CEDAR POSTS WITH BOTTOM PART WRAPPED IN MASONRY, CEDAR SHAKE, SIDING, AND ORNAMENTAL LIGHTING, DECORATIVE BRACKETS, GABLE WINDOWS, AND EITHER A CARRIAGE STYLE GARAGE DOOR OR A CRAFTSMAN STYLE GARAGE DOOR.
THE FRONT ELEVATION OF EACH UNIT IN BUILDING TYPE B SHALL INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, ORNAMENTAL LIGHTING SHUTTERS, GABLE WINDOW, AND EITHER A CARRIAGE STYLE GARAGE DOOR OR A CRAFTSMAN STYLE GARAGE DOOR.
FOR COLOR PALETTE, A MINIMUM OF TWO DIFFERENT COLOR SCHEMES WOULD BE PROVIDED FOR BUILDING TYPE A AND BUILDING TYPE B.
AND THESE ARE, UM, STANDARDS THAT WERE ACHIEVED AS ENHANCEMENTS.
AS A PART OF THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, I WILL ALSO, UH, FOCUS ON THE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS.
AND SO THE INFORMATION THAT'S INCLUDED ON THE SLIDES ARE A PART OF YOUR PACKET, BUT I'LL FOCUS AND HIGHLIGHT THE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR TH DISTRICT.
THE STANDARDS ARE SILENT, BUT FOR THE PROPOSED PD STANDARDS, SCREENING SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE PROPERTY AND NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.
THE SCREENING SHALL BE LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN HOA LOTS AND SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING, SIX FOOT TALL MASONRY WALLS AND A RIGHT WROUGHT IRON ORNAMENTAL GATE WITH KNOX BOX FOR FIRE ACCESS ALONG THE SEGMENT OF THE SCREENING FACING THE DEAD END INTERIOR STREET, WHICH WILL VISUALIZE AS A PART OF THE CONCEPT PLAN.
ON THE NEXT SLIDE, AN EIGHT FOOT TALL BOARD ON BOARD PRIVACY FENCE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN LOTS ONE THROUGH 14 AND HOA LOT TWO ALONG THE LOT LINES ADJOINING A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT OR ANY OTHER PORTION OF A PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.
SO IT WOULD BE BETWEEN THIS DEVELOPMENT AND RESIDENTIALLY, UM, RESIDENTIALLY LAND USE PROPERTIES.
I HIGHLIGHT THIS IN RED BECAUSE THIS
[00:35:01]
IS A PART OF WHAT OUR PLAN COMMISSION HAS CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THEIR RECOMMENDATION, AND SO WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT.UNDER PREVIOUS BULLET 0.6 FOOT TALL WOOD PRIVACY FENCES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE REAR YARDS OF THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
AND AGAIN, THE BOARD ON BOARD WOOD IS SOMETHING THAT COULD BE MAINTAINED IN INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP FOR EACH OF THE PROPERTIES.
SO I'LL WALK YOU THROUGH THE CONCEPT SITE PLAN BRIEFLY AND HIGHLIGHT SOME THINGS THAT, UH, I HAVEN'T ALREADY TOUCHED ON.
THE RED BOUNDARY SHOWS THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SUBJECT SIDE ITSELF.
AGAIN, THERE ARE 27 TOWN HOMES PROPOSED.
I'VE TALKED ABOUT THE, UM, LAYOUT AND THE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH OF THOSE TOWNHOUSES, AS WELL AS THE LOT AREA WHICH WOULD BE 3000 SQUARE FEET.
I'LL REMIND YOU THAT THERE ARE FIVE HOA LOTS AND VISITOR PARKING, UH, PROVIDED A MINIMUM OF 14% OF THE GROSS LAND AREA WITHIN THE ENTIRE PD SHALL BE DEVOTED TO OPEN SPACE WITH AMENITIES LIKE PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, PARK BENCHES, PICNIC TABLES, A BARBECUE GRILL, AND TRASH CANS.
AND AGAIN, THESE ARE ENHANCEMENTS THAT ARE ACHIEVED AS A PART OF THE PD.
THE EIGHT FOOT TALL BOARD ON BOARD PRIVACY FENCE, UM, ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WILL BE INCLUDED AS A PART OF THIS PROPOSAL.
AND THAT'S SHOWN BY THE OUTLINE IN BROWN.
AND THOSE ARE THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE, UM, A PART OF THE PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATE, UM, FENCING EXCEPT AS REQUIRED UNDER PREVIOUS BULLET.
AGAIN, THE SIX FOOT TALL WOOD PRIVACY FENCES WOULD BE IN THE REAR YARDS OF THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
AND THE SCREENING OF THE HOO OF, UM, THE PROPERTIES ALONG NORTH, NO, EXCUSE ME, NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD, EXCUSE ME, WOULD BE WITHIN HOA LOTS.
AND THAT WOULD BE A SIX FOOT TALL MASONRY WALL WITH LANDSCAPING.
AND AGAIN, THAT LANDSCAPING IS ALSO AN ENHANCEMENT THAT WOULD BE ACHIEVED THROUGH THE PD.
WHILE I HAVE THE SITE PLAN BEFORE YOU, I DO WANT TO NOTE THE RED ARROW, WHICH SHOWS THE ACCESS INTO THE SITE ALONG NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD.
UH, THIS IS A PROTECTED LEFT TURN LANE.
IT WOULD NOT ALLOW FOR TURN OUT OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH.
UH, THERE IS A, UH, DIVIDER, A LANE THAT, UM, CUT THROUGH, IF YOU WILL, AT BLUE STEM, WHICH IS FURTHER SOUTH.
HOWEVER, THERE ARE SOME SITE CONSTRAINTS THAT LIMITED THE ABILITY TO HAVE THE PROPOSED STREET CONNECT AT THAT VANTAGE POINT.
UH, THERE WOULD'VE BEEN A REQUIREMENT TO CONNECT AND COLLABORATE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER AND THAT WAS NOT ABLE TO BE ACHIEVED.
SO STAFF DID TAKE A LOOK AT THAT ALTERNATIVE.
THE CONCEPT BUILDING, UH, A ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN HERE AND WE HAVE A 35% BRICK WITH 65% FIBER CEMENT SIDING.
THE SIDE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN HERE FOR BUILDING A AND THIS IS 50% BRICK WITH FIBER CEMENT SIDING AT 50%.
THIS IS THE ELEVATION FOR, UM, BUILDING B AS WELL AS THE PERCENTAGE BREAKDOWN OF THE BUILDING MATERIAL.
AND I WILL REMIND YOU THAT HOUSE BILL 24 39, UH, RESTRICTS CITIES FROM CONTROLLING FOR THESE ELEMENTS.
HOWEVER, AS A PART OF A PD, WE CAN WORK IN COLLABORATION WITH THE, UM, DEVELOPER, UH, TO ACHIEVE THESE, UM, THESE ELEMENTS.
I WILL SAY THEY ARE COMPARABLE TO OTHER DEVELOPMENTS THAT WE'VE SEEN HERE IN THE CITY.
THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN RENDERING A DECISION ON A ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION.
AND SO WE DID GO THROUGH EACH OF THESE AS A PART OF, UH, OUR CONSIDERATION FOR THIS PROPOSAL AND THE DETAILS OF THAT ARE INVOLVED ARE PROVIDED IN YOUR PACKET.
I'LL GO THROUGH THOSE BRIEFLY.
UH, FACTOR NUMBER ONE, WHETHER THE USE IS PERMITTED BY THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA CONCERNED IN THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE GENERAL AREA AND THE CITY AS A WHOLE.
UH, THIS, UH, DEVELOPMENT IS COMPARABLE TO WHAT IS SEEN, UM, IN, UH, ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS SUCH AS HOMES, COVEY HOMES, UH, BUT GENERALLY THE AREA IS SINGLE FAMILY WITH DETACHED HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF WATERFORD OAKS.
AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY THAT'S ZONE LOCAL RETAIL.
FURTHER, I WILL SHARE THAT WITH THE DENSITY OF 7.69 UNITS PER ACRE OR 27 UNITS, A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF TWO STORIES AND THE SCALE OF THE PROPOSED TOWNHOUSES, WE FIND THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS.
FURTHERMORE, THE TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT WOULD PROVIDE THE DESIRED TRANSITION FROM THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS TO THE LOCAL RETAIL ZONE PROPERTIES THAT ARE ALONG THE JOE WILSON ROAD FACTOR.
NUMBER TWO, WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS IN ACCORDANCE
[00:40:01]
WITH ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PLANS FOR PROVIDING PUBLIC SCHOOLS, STREETS, WATER SUPPLY, SANITARY SEWERS, OR OTHER UTILITIES TO THE AREA, WE FIND THAT, UM, ALL OF THESE FACTORS ARE MET AND THE TIA HAS LED TO THE, UH, PROVISION OF THE HOODED OR PROTECTED LEFT TURN LANE FOR NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD, UM, FOR ACCESS TO THIS DEVELOPMENT FACTOR.NUMBER THREE, THE AMOUNT OF VACANT LAND CURRENTLY CLASSIFIED FOR SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT IN THE VICINITY AND ELSEWHERE IN THE CITY.
AND ANY SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH WOULD MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF SUCH VACANT LAND UNAVAILABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT CITYWIDE A TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE PERMITTED BY WRIGHT AS MENTIONED IN THE TH DISTRICT, THE MF DISTRICT AND BY CUP AND THE OT DISTRICT.
THERE ARE VERY FEW SITES ALREADY ZONED FOR TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT AND MOST OF THEM ARE PD DISTRICTS.
FACTOR NUMBER FOUR, THE RECENT RATE AT WHICH LAND IS BEING DEVELOPED IN THE SAME ZONING CLASSIFICATION AS THE REQUEST, PARTICULARLY IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE.
AT THIS TIME, THIS IS THE ONLY ACTIVE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FACTOR.
NUMBER FIVE, HOW OTHER AR HOW OTHER AREAS DESIGNATED FOR SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OR UNLIKELY TO BE AFFECTED IF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS APPROVED.
SAS FINDINGS THAT IF APPROVED THE PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO HAVE AN EFFECT ON OTHER AREAS DESIGNATED FOR SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT.
AND FACTOR NUMBER SIX, ANY OTHER FACTORS WHICH WILL SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALS, OR GENERAL WELFARE.
IT IS UNKNOWN IF REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL IMPACT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALS, OR GENERAL WELFARE.
WE FIND THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE AREAS IDENTIFIED AS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER.
AND THESE ARE AREAS THAT ARE, UM, THAT CONTAIN OFFICE RETAIL OR INFILL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES, WHICH THIS IS EXCLUDING TRADITIONAL SUBURBAN STYLE APARTMENT COMPLEXES.
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ARE LOW INTENSITY, UNOBTRUSIVE AND DESIGNED AT A SCALE TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH NEARBY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, WHICH WE FIND THIS TO BE.
THE APPLICANT MET WITH MEMBERS OF THE WATERFORD OAKS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND PER THE APPLICANT, THE CONVERSATION WITH THE RESIDENTS INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING TOPICS, PRICE POINT OF TOWNHOUSES, UH, STREET SAFETY, INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM THE SITE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL, THE SIZE OF THE TOWNHOUSES, WHETHER THE TOWNHOUSES WILL BE FOR SALE OR FOR LEASE.
AND THE REQUEST TO HAVE A HIGHER QUALITY PRIVACY FENCE BETWEEN TOWNHOUSES AND ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PER TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.
UH, WE NOTIFIED THIS ITEM IN THE RAMBLER TEXAS MEDIA ON SATURDAY MAY 2ND.
WE ALSO NOTIFIED 30 PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET, UM, OF THIS PROPERTY, A COURTESY NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE WATERFORD OAKS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND AS OF TODAY, WE'VE RECEIVED ZERO LETTERS OF SUPPORT AND WE DID RECEIVE ONE LETTER OF OPPOSITION AHEAD OF THE PLAN COMMISSION MEETING.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND EXHIBITS.
COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND EXHIBITS WITH CONSIDERATION OF A MASONRY FENCE AND THAT'S ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS.
WE DID ASK THE APPLICANT TO EXPLORE THIS OPTION.
WE ALSO RESEARCHED THIS OPTION AS WELL.
ONE THING TO NOTE THAT THERE IS AN EASEMENT THAT'S NOT A CITY EASEMENT, UH, IN THIS AREA THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE CROSSED BY THESE, UH, BY THIS FENCE.
AND SO THAT WOULD BE A CHALLENGE, UH, AS PART OF ACHIEVING THE GOAL OF A MASONRY FENCE.
IN ADDITION, I WILL NOTE THAT IF IT WERE TO BE A MASONRY FENCE, IT WOULD NEED TO BE AN HOA OWNERSHIP FOR MAINTENANCE.
UM, AND SO THOSE ARE SOME OF THE CONSIDERATIONS THAT WOULD NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.
THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT AND AVAILABLE TO RESPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS.
WITH THAT, I'M AVAILABLE AS WELL.
SO, UH, DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE A PRESENTATION OR THEY ARE AVAILABLE? OKAY.
EVENING MAYOR PRO TEM AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.
YOU'RE EXPECTING AN ARCHITECT TO COME DOWN HERE.
YOU GOT A CIVIL ENGINEER INSTEAD.
UH, HE COULD NOT BE HERE TONIGHT, BUT I HAVE BEEN WORKING, WORKING WITH PHILIP, UH, FROM THE VERY BEGINNING ON THIS PROJECT.
THE OWNER, UH, DEVELOPER IS IN THE AUDIENCE ALSO.
HE'S ASKED ME TO COME DOWN AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
UM, UH, I'M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT.
WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON IT FOR A LONG TIME.
AND I WILL SAY YOUR CITY STAFF IS VERY THOROUGH.
WE'VE BEEN THROUGH FOUR REVIEWS AND, UH, WE'VE ANSWERED EACH ONE OF THOSE QUESTIONS ABOUT 15 PAGES.
AND THEN WE SEND ALL THAT BACK IN.
WE GET ANOTHER 12 AND THEN ANOTHER NINE, AND WE FINALLY GOT IT DOWN TO ZERO AND HAVE ADDRESSED
[00:45:01]
ALL THE QUESTIONS THAT WE GOT FROM YOUR CITY STAFF.I, UH, I HOPE YOU GUYS ARE AS EXCITED AS WE ARE ABOUT THIS PROJECT.
BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ALRIGHT, AT, AT THIS POINT WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CITIZENS' INPUT, AND THEN WE WILL BRING YOU UP FOR QUESTIONS.
SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
DO WE HAVE ANY RESIDENTS WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER PD 6 8 8 2 0 2 4.
DO WE HAVE ANY RESIDENTS WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER PD 6 8 8 2 0 2 4? PLEASE APPROACH STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
I LIVE AT 100 MARSHALL DRIVE, RIGHT BEHIND THIS DEVELOPMENT.
I SENT IN A LETTER, BUT I THOUGHT I WOULD READ IT 'CAUSE IT WAS KIND OF LAST MINUTE.
UM, I KNOW YOU GUYS ARE BUSY TODAY.
I'M WRITING TO RESPECTFULLY EXPRESS MY OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED REZONING OF 2 0 8 NORTH JOE WILSON ROAD FOR TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT.
THE PROPOSED REZONING OF THE PROPERTY BEHIND OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD PERMANENTLY TRANSFORM A VALUABLE GREEN SPACE THAT CURRENTLY PROVIDES PRIVACY, NATURAL BEAUTY, AND A BUFFER BETWEEN EXISTING HOMES AND SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT.
THIS LAND CONTRIBUTES SIGNIFICANTLY TO THE CHARACTER AND QUALITY OF LIFE ENJOYED BY NEARBY RESIDENTS CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS ALSO RAISE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE NECESSITY OF ADDING ADDITIONAL HOUSING INVENTORY IN THIS LOCATION.
A REVIEW OF INVENTORY IN THIS LOCATION, OR A REVIEW OF AVAILABLE HOMES IN CEDAR HILL SHOWS THAT THERE ARE CURRENTLY 56 HOMES LISTED BETWEEN 300,000 AND $400,000, WHICH IS THE PROPOSED PRICE RANGE THAT THEY'VE LISTED IN THE LAST MEETING.
OF THOSE HOMES, 20 HAVE BEEN BUILT WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS, INCLUDING 11 NEWLY CONSTRUCTED HOMES.
IN ADDITION, BROADMOOR VILLAGE TOWN HOMES BY STARLIGHT LOCATED JUST DOWN THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY HAS FIVE TOWN HOMES AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE AS WELL AS 11 UNDEVELOPED LOTS WITH SEVERAL FLOOR PLANS AVAILABLE TO FUTURE BUYERS.
GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF EXISTING AND RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED HOUSING ALREADY AVAILABLE IN THE AREA, I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT REZONING THE PROPERTY FOR ADDITIONAL TOWN HOMES SERVES A DEMONSTRATED COMMUNITY NEED.
INSTEAD, INCREASING HOUSING SUPPLY AND IMMEDIATE PROXIMITY TO ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOODS MAY NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR PROPERTY VALUES AND CREATE ADDITIONAL COMPETITION FOR HOMEOWNERS SEEKING TO SELL THEIR PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE.
BEYOND FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD DIMINISH THE PRIVACY TRANQUILITY AND OPEN GREEN SPACE THE CURRENT RESIDENTS ENJOY.
THE SECOND STORY OF THE TOWNHOMES WOULD LOOK DIRECTLY IN OUR BACKYARDS, SOMETHING AN EIGHT FOOT FENCE WOULD NOT FIX.
MANY HOMEOWNERS INVESTED IN THIS AREA WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LAND BEHIND THEIR HOMES SERVED AS A NATURAL BUFFER VIA THE GREEN SPACE OR LARGE BACKYARDS OF FUTURE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
REPLACING THAT BUFFER WITH DENSE RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION SUCH AS TOWN HOMES WOULD FUNDAMENTALLY ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND REDUCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR EXISTING RESIDENTS.
FOR THOSE REASONS, I RESPECTFULLY URGE THE CITY COUNCIL TO DENY THE REZONING REQUEST AND PRESERVE THE EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPERTY.
ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER PD 6 8 8 2 0 2 4? NOT SEEING ANYONE ELSE APPROACH.
I WILL CLOSE THIS PORTION OF THE PUBLIC MEETING.
COUNSEL, DO YOU HAVE ANY? HE SAID DIDN'T HAVE A PRESENTATION, SIR, DO YOU THE A THE APPLICANT, DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION? YES.
CAN YOU PLEASE APPROACH AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE, I THOUGHT THE GENTLEMAN WHO CAME BEFORE YOU DID NOT HAVE A PRESENTATION.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.
YES, GABRIEL EPO, 6 0 9 VANILLA COURT, DESOTO, TEXAS 7 5 1 1 5.
I LIVE, I LIVE DOWN THE STREET BY BELTLINE.
I I SENT, UH, A MARKET COMPARATIVE MARKET ANALYSIS.
I'M A BUILDER FOR OVER 30 YEARS NOW.
I BUILD SOME HERE IN CEDAR HILL, UH, WHICH, UH, UH, I CAN EVEN GIVE YOU STREET ADDRESS TO DRIVE BY AND SEE.
AND, UH, I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS NEIGHBORS, BUT, UH, IN EVERY SUBDIVISION THERE IS GONNA BE A TWO STORY THAT PEOPLE WILL LOOK DOWN INTO YOUR
[00:50:01]
BACKYARD.IS, IT DOESN'T, IS NOT RESTRICTED TO TOWNHOUSES.
ONLY ALL SUBDIVISIONS HAS TWO STORIES.
SO THAT, UH, DOESN'T REALLY, THAT IS JUST LIKE A TALKING POINT.
AND I SENT A MARKET COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS TO THE STAFF TO REVIEW, AND I THOUGHT THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SHOW YOU ON THE OVERHEAD SO THAT I, I CAN WALK YOU THROUGH THAT.
HOW LONG IS YOUR PRESENTATION? I DON'T KNOW HOW, HOW LONG? WELL, WE, WE HAVE A T WELL, WE HAVE THE CONDUCT THE BUSINESS OF THE CITY.
SO IF YOU COULD KEEP YOUR PRESENTATION TO ABOUT FIVE MINUTES.
OH, SO WE CAN, SO WE CAN DO, YES.
IT'S GONNA BE UNDER THAT, EXCUSE ME.
IT'S GONNA BE UNDER FIVE MINUTES.
AND I'M GONNA WALK YOU THROUGH QUICKLY.
THIS IS THE MARKET ANALYSIS? YEAH.
PRESS THIS BUTTON TO ADVANCE THE SLIDES.
RED ONE, IF YOU HAVE TO GO BACK.
JUST IGNORE THE WRITINGS THERE.
I ALSO WANTED TO SEE HOW DO WE MAKE IT BIGGER? OKAY.
YOU CAN SEE THERE I PULL LIKE SEVEN HOMES.
OH, UH, THE FIRST ONE THERE IS, UH, UH, MY PROPERTY, WHICH SHOWS ON THE BLUE, THE BLUE ARROW THERE.
AND NEXT TO THAT IS THE GULF FENCE IS THE STREET IN FRONT OF MY PROPERTY.
HE'S IN A WATERFORD FOUR FOOT SUB DIVISION.
HE'S 1600 SQUARE FEET AND HE'S SELLING FOR 275.
PENN ROSE IS THE NEW TOWNHOUSES BY STARLIGHT HOMES.
YOU SEE, THEY'RE SELLING 1700 SQUARE FOOT IS SELLING FOR, UH, 295.
THE NEXT ONE IS THE SAME TOWNHOUSE HE'S SELLING FOR 300,000.
AND THE THE THIRD ONE, THE 16 6 11 62 GALVET IS A STREET NEXT TO ME.
YOU CAN SEE THERE, IT'S, UH, SELLING FOR TWO 50.
IF, IF I CAN OFFER JUST A LITTLE GUIDANCE.
WE ARE HERE TO DISCUSS THE ZONING.
NOT NECESSARILY THE PROPERTY VALUES.
OR SO IF YOU CAN DISCUSS OR IF YOUR PRESENTATION SHARE WITH US YOUR PRODUCT.
WE'RE, WE'RE NOT HERE TO, TO DISCUSS THE VALUATIONS OF, OF THE PROPERTIES.
I WAS RESPONDING TO THE LAST PLEASE RESPOND TO COUNSEL.
NOT TO THE A NOT TO THE THE CITIZEN.
THE, THE LAST, UH, SPEAKER TALKING ABOUT THE VALUE, THAT IS WHY I WANTED TO POINT OUT EVEN THE SUBDIVISION, THE BEGINNING SQUARE FOOT IS 1800 SQUARE FOOT.
SO THAT I THINK THAT WILL DO FOR NOW ON THAT.
BUT, UH, UH, AS A BUILDER, I'VE BEEN SELLING REAL ESTATE FOR 30 YEARS.
I KNOW WHAT, UH, BUYERS LIKE AND WANT.
THAT IS WHY WHAT I BROUGHT, EVEN YOU, IF YOU LOOK AT THE DENSITY, ONE, ONE ACRE IS SUPPOSED TO DEAL 14 LOTS.
BUT IF YOU LOOK AT MINE, I CUT IT DOWN TO HALF SEVEN, SEVEN LOTS PER ACRE.
SO I DON'T BRING ANYTHING THAT WILL AFFECT THE IMPACT, THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY BEHIND.
AND ALSO, IF YOU LOOK AT, UH, UH, THE STARLIGHT HOME THAT IS SENDING THE BROADMOOR SUBDIVISION, THE BUILDING, UH, UH, THE FRONT SETBACK IS, UH, 18 FEET AND THE REAR IS EIGHT BOTTOM BUILDING, 125 FEET FRONT SETBACK AND 15 REAR SETBACK TO PUSH THE PROPERTY AWAY FROM THE BOUNDARY SO THAT IT DOESN'T AFFECT EVERYTHING I DO, I DO DOUBLE, DOUBLE.
EVEN IF YOU LOOK AT THE, THE SQUARE FOOT, NORTH SQUARE FOOT,
[00:55:01]
MINE IS 3.5.IF YOU LOOK AT THE LAST, THE LAST ROW, I, I BUILT EIGHT HOMES THERE.
BUT IF YOU MULTIPLY 30 BY, UH, UH, UH, UH, UH, 30, UH, BY EIGHT, IF YOU'RE GONNA HAVE 240 UH FEET, WHICH IF I DEFY THAT, IF I FOLLOW THE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT, UH, ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNHOUSES, I WOULD BUILD 10 HOMES THERE.
BUT I BUILD IT, I CUT DOWN ON EVERYTHING.
AND WHERE I MET WITH THE, UH, THE NEIGHBORS, THEY, THEY GAVE ME A LOT OF SUGGESTIONS.
AND I INCORPORATED ALL THAT INTO THE FINAL THAT WE ARE HERE TODAY.
SO I'M, I'M NOT DOING ANYTHING TO HURT MY NEIGHBORS.
INSTEAD, THIS PROPERTY IS GOING TO, UH, INCREASE THE VALUE OF THEIR PROPERTY, NOT AFFECTING THEM NEGATIVELY.
SO THAT, THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.
UH, AND NOT ONLY THAT, THIS IS THE ONLY OPPORTUNITY I HAVE.
YOU MIGHT REMEMBER THIS PROPERTY, YOU SIGN IT, RELINQUISH THAT RULE LINE TO ME, AND I'M FOREVER GRATEFUL.
THANK YOU, SIR, FOR GENEROSITY.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION, SIR.
SO NOW I WILL OPEN THIS UP TO COUNCIL IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS THAT WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND OPEN THIS UP FOR COUNCIL.
FIRST ONE IS COUNCIL MEMBER MCCURDY.
UM, DIRECTOR SELF, I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS FOR YOU.
THE, IN IN THIS PD, THE, THE REAR YARDS, UH, SETBACK, IS IT GONNA BE MAINTAINED AT 30 FEET? LET ME CONFIRM THAT.
IF ACTUALLY, IF WE CAN BRING UP THE POWERPOINT AGAIN.
I CAN SHOW YOU DETAIL, RESPOND TO YOUR QUESTION.
SO I BELIEVE THE ZONE, THE, THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT'S ON THERE REQUIRES A A 30 FOOT REAR YARD.
IS THAT CORRECT? IT'S SF 22 AND SF 15.
I JUST WANT TO BRING THAT UP FOR YOU TO HAVE IN FRONT OF, UM, SO TO YOUR QUESTION ABOUT SETBACK, UM, THE TH DISTRICT WILL REQUIRE 25 FEET.
UH, FOR THIS ONE, THE MINIMUM YARD SET, THE SIDE YARD SETBACK WOULD BE, UH, FIVE FEET.
UM, THE PROPOSED FEE IS PD DOES NOT, UH, OFFER ANY OTHER AMENDMENTS.
SO THE TH BASE WOULD BE WHAT YOU SEE IN FRONT OF YOU UNDER THE MINIMUM YARD SETBACK UNDER TH DISTRICT.
SO FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 25 FEET, UM, SIDE YARD SETBACK, 10 FEET, UH, REAR 15 FEET.
SO THOSE WOULD BE THE STANDARDS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED AS THE, UM, THE APPLICATION OF THE TH BASE FOR THIS PD.
SO DOES, DOES THAT GO WITH THE TH DISTRICT STANDARD, THE 15 FEET? IT DOES, BUT THIS PD THE BASE FOR THE PD IS THE TH DISTRICT UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN IN THE YELLOW.
SO, AND THE, THE HEIGHT, UH, REQUIREMENT IS, I SAW IT, I BELIEVE IT'S 35 FEET AND IT'S, UH, IT'S ALSO 35 FEET IN THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING.
SO THE TH DISTRICT WOULD BE 35 FEET MM-HMM
UM, AND SO THAT WOULD BE MAINTAINED AS A BASE FOR THIS PD.
SO, SO THE ONLY REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TH STANDARD AND THE SF 15 AND SF 22 STANDARD IS THE REAR YARD.
WE'RE GONNA BE, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT REDUCING IT BY, BY 15 FEET.
SO THE BY BY GOING WITH, IF WE ADOPT THE TH ZONING AS IS, I THINK I WANT TO OFFER A POINT OF CLARIFICATION.
THE, UH, SF SEVEN AND SF 22 WOULD NOT ALLOW THIS.
AND SO WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT A TH BASE FOR THIS.
THAT IS A COMPARISON, CORRECT.
SO I, I, I GUESS WHAT, WHAT, WHAT I'M, WHAT I, I LOOK AT IS, YOU KNOW, OR, OR WHAT I TRY TO THINK ABOUT IS THE REASONABLE STANDARD RULE, WHAT I REFER TO AS A REASONABLE STANDARD RULE.
WHAT IS REASONABLE FOR SOMEBODY THAT THAT'S ALREADY NEXT DOOR TO EXPECT? IS IT REASONABLE TO EXPECT IT'S GONNA REMAIN GREEN SPACE? N NO, IT, IT'S NOT YOUR PROPERTY.
SOMEBODY ELSE HAS THE RIGHT TO DEVELOP IT.
WHAT WAS THE ZONING ON THAT PROPERTY? MM-HMM
IT, IT, IT DOES, THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DOES ALLOW TWO STORIES, BUT IT DOES REQUIRE A LARGER REAR YARD, WHICH MEANS THAT THOSE STRUCTURES WOULD NOT BE AS CLOSE TO THE FENCE AS WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED.
TO CHANGE IT NOW IS, IS IT POSSIBLE IF WE ADOPT THIS, THAT WE CAN MAKE IT WHERE THE REAR YARD IT REQUIREMENT IS THE SAME AS THE RESIDENTIAL STANDARD SO THAT IT, SO THAT THE
[01:00:02]
SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS WOULD NOT BE, UH, IMPUGNED UPON? THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING YOUR QUESTION.SO FOR SF 22, THE REAR YARD WOULD BE 30 FEET.
AND FOR THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT, THEY'RE PROPOSING 15 BECAUSE OF THE TH BASE MM-HMM
AND SO I WOULD HAVE TO DEFER TO THE APPLICANT AS TO WHETHER THEY WOULD STILL BE ABLE TO ACHIEVE THE DEVELOPMENT IF THEY WERE REQUIRED TO DOUBLE THE REAR YARD SETBACK TO MEET THE SF 22.
THAT, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE EXPLOITED.
SO THAT'S A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT THEN? YES, SIR.
THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT QUESTION.
SO I, I GUESS THAT QUE MY, MY QUESTION THEN GOES TO THE APPLICANT.
I, IF, IF THE REAR YARD SETBACK WERE INCREASED TO THE SAME AS THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING, WHICH WOULD MAKE IT 30 FEET INSTEAD OF 15 FEET, COULD YOU STILL MOVE FORWARD WITH YOUR PROJECT? YES, PLEASE.
YOU NEED, YOU NEED TO COME UP HERE.
PLEASE COME TO THE FRONT, PLEASE.
NO, THAT WILL NOT BE LY THE, I BUILD, I, I GIVE YOU THE STREET ADDRESS, 7 0 5 LAVENE BEHIND THE POST OFFICE.
ANY OF YOU CAN DRIVE BY AND SEE THAT HOUSE.
WHEN I BUILD THAT HOUSE, PEOPLE WILL COME OUT AND SAY, THIS IS THE BEST BUILT HOUSE ON THE STREET.
THE, THE STANDARD, A SETBACK FOR A, THAT WAS A 7,500, A 7,500 SQUARE FOOT LOT.
IS 20 A 25 FRONT SET, 15 REAR.
THAT IS THE, UH, THE ORDINANCE, UNLESS YOU GO TO, TO THE, UH, SAY, UH, 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS, EVEN 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS, I BELIEVE IN DESOTO IS STILL 25 REAR, BUT, SO THIS IS CEDAR HILL.
THIS IS NOT, THIS IS NOT DESOTO.
I, I'M JUST THAT CITING AN EXAMPLE.
UH, BUT IT WILL NOT BE FEASIBLE.
IT'S, YOU, YOU CAN EVEN SEE COMPARING IT TO STARLIGHT HOMES, THEY'RE BUILDING EIGHT FOOT REAR GO, YOU APPROVE THOSE THAT, THAT DEVELOPMENT BROUGHT MORE.
AND THE FRONT IS 19, 18 FEET, BUT A BUILDING 25 AND THE REAR AND BUILDING 15.
I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS, SIR.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNSEL? COUNCILWOMAN AZI? I WANNA TRY TO KEEP MY QUESTIONS.
UM, I HAD A, A COUPLE SIMILAR THOUGHTS TO COUNCILMAN MCCURDY, BUT I WANT TO TRY TO KEEP MY QUESTIONS AS A, UH, FOCUSED ON THE ZONING CASE.
UM, BUT I THINK IT'S, IM, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT I WANT TO ASK THE, THE, UH, DEVELOPER QUESTION.
I'M SORRY I MADE YOU GO ALL THE WAY BACK.
UM, ONE, I THINK I, SOMEONE, UM, MADE THE OFFER OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CONCEPTS THAT YOU HAVE DONE MM-HMM
UM, I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE, TAKE YOU UP ON THAT OFFER AND CAN WORK THAT OUT WITH, WITH STAFF, BECAUSE WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS FIRST CLARIFICATION.
I'VE BEEN AND YOU'RE THE DEVELOPER? YES.
I'LL SEND YOU, UH, UH, UH, WHAT EVEN ADVANCE I WANT, I WANT TO, I WANT TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT IT IS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND OTHERS MAY LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
SO AS, AS THE BUILDER AND ALSO THE DEVELOPER MM-HMM
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE BUILT AND DEVELOPED, UM, THAT WOULD BE A REASONABLE COMPARISON.
UM, I UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE, UM, YOUR, YOUR 30 YEARS IT SOUNDS LIKE DEEP EXPERIENCE WITH BUILDING.
AND SO I UNDERSTAND YOU BRING THAT TO THE TABLE MM-HMM
BUT I WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU HAVE BUILT AND DEVELOPED.
UM, THAT WOULD BE OF SOMETHING THAT WE COULD REASONABLY COMPARE.
SO THAT'S ONE THING THAT WOULD HELP ME.
UM, AND I THINK THAT'S ALL THAT I HAVE FOR YOU, BUT I DO HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF THAT'S OKAY.
UM, I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS REGARDING,
[01:05:01]
UH, THE, THE ZONING CASE.AND, UM, WE HAVE IN CEDAR HILL, UM, WE DO HAVE, WE DO HAVE A HURDLE OF ADDITIONAL HOUSING STOCK, OF, OF INVENTORY, OF SPACE, OF DENSITY, UH, ON PAPER.
THIS HELPS US TO GET CLOSER TO SOLVING A PART OF THAT PROBLEM.
UM, I, AS IT RELATES TO THE ZONING, I AM NOT NECESSARILY OPPOSED TO THE ZONING BECAUSE IT'S EITHER GOING TO, YOU KNOW, AS IS BE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OR CHANGED, UM, TO THIS.
AND THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT GIVES US MORE, UM, ABILITY, UM, TO MAKE IT CLOSER TO WHAT WE'D LIKE IT TO BE.
MY, ONE OF MY BIGGER CONCERNS IS, AND I THINK THIS IS WHERE ALL OF US, IF YOU TAKE THE DRIVE FROM HIGHWAY 67, IF YOU GO DOWN JOE WILSON, YOU TAKE THE DRIVE FROM HIGHWAY 67 AND YOU DRIVE TO PLEASANT RUN, I'VE COUNTED MYSELF FOUR APARTMENT COMPLEXES.
ONE OF THEM SENIOR LIVING, THAT'S, THAT'S LESS THAN TWO AND A HALF MILES OF APARTMENT COMPLEXES.
THERE'S FOUR, THERE'S GARDEN HOMES, THERE'S RENTAL HOMES, THERE'S LEASE HOMES, THERE'S ALL KINDS OF DENSITY.
AND SO I HAVE A BIGGER CONCERN OF WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THAT ENTIRE AREA.
IT'S NOT ABOUT YOUR PROJECT, BUT I FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN WE'RE THINKING ABOUT THIS ZONING CHANGE BECAUSE OF WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE ENTIRE AREA FROM HIGHWAY 67 TO PARKVILLE ROAD, COUNTLESS.
UM, BUT THERE'S THE BALANCE BECAUSE WE NEED DIVERSE HOUSING.
SO I FEEL THAT, UM, I WANNA OFFER THAT CAUTION.
UH, I AM OPEN TO THE ZONING CHANGE AS IT IS PRESENTED, UM, BEFORE US, BECAUSE IT DOES SOLVE SOMETHING FOR THE CITY.
UM, DIVERSE HOUSING STOCK IS STILL SOMETHING THAT WE NEED.
IT DOESN'T NEED TO ALL BE IN THE SAME PLACE.
UM, AND IT DOESN'T ALWAYS NEED TO BE ON THE EAST SIDE
SO, UM, THAT'S KIND OF LIKE MY, THAT'S, THAT'S THE EXTENT OF MY COMMENTS, BUT I WOULD, UM, LIKE FOR THE RECORD THAT I'VE REQUESTED THIS FROM THE, THE BUILDER AND, UM, DEVELOPER, I THINK THAT THAT'S AN INTERESTING, UM, COMBINATION.
UM, AND WE SHOULD, UM, MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE CLEAR GOING FORWARD OF HOW THAT MIGHT LOOK.
NEXT UP IS, AND, AND JUST I THINK YOU DID THE EXCEPTIONALLY, BUT ALSO WE JUST WANNA STATE FOR THE RECORD TONIGHT, WE ARE HERE DEBATING, OR WE ARE HERE FOR CASE NUMBER PD 6 88 2 0 2 4, WHICH IS A CHANGE IN ZONING.
AND ON TOP OF THAT A PLAN DEVELOPMENT.
NEXT UP IS COUNCIL MEMBER ALLISON SIMS AND THANK YOU MAYOR PROIN.
SO, UH, A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I HAD, I, I HEARD FROM OUR PLANNING DIRECTOR THAT THIS PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT, UH, IS A SUITABLE BUFFER FROM THE RETAIL ZONING.
I HEARD IT'S A SUITABLE TRANSITION.
AND UM, I ALSO HEARD THINGS ABOUT HOW WONDERFUL IT IS AS GREEN SPACE.
WELL, I KNOW THE WAY TO GUARANTEE GREEN SPACE IS IF YOU PURCHASE IT, IF YOU OWN IT, YOU CAN KEEP IT GREEN SPACE FOREVER.
BUT IT IS HARD FOR ME TO SOMEONE ELSE'S PROPERTY TO MANDATE THAT THEY KEEP IT GREEN SPACE.
I THINK THAT'S TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE FOR SOMEONE TO DICTATE TO MY PROPERTY.
THAT COULD BE AN ASSET AND MAYBE A SOURCE OF INCOME TO MY FAMILY, MY CHILDREN, TO KEEP IT GREEN SPACE.
THAT'S JUST, THAT'S, THAT'S NOT APPROPRIATE.
THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE THAT'S, TO ME THAT SEPARATES THIS FROM THAT GOING DOWN.
JOE WILSON, I KNOW RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET THERE ARE LARGER HOMES, BUT THEY'RE FOR RENT.
AND AS I UNDERSTAND THIS IS GONNA BE OWNER OCCU, THESE ARE TOWNHOUSES TO PURCHASE.
AND I THINK A LOT OF US HAVE SEEN AND EXPERIENCED WALKING NEIGHBORHOODS AND WE HAVE SEEN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOMEBODY THAT OWNS PROPERTY AND SOMEBODY THAT RENTS PROPERTY.
AND I, MY EXPERIENCES, THIS IS A BROAD GENERALIZATION, IT'S NOT A HUNDRED PERCENT, BUT PEOPLE THAT OWN PROPERTY HAVE A, A TENDENCY TO BE MORE INVESTED IN MAKING SURE IT'S TAKEN CARE OF.
SO YOU, YOU WERE, YOU'RE TELLING ME THIS
[01:10:01]
IS GOING TO BE, UH, TOWNHOUSES FOR PURCHASE, NOT FOR RENT.THAT IS WHY I GUARANTEE YOU WHEN I BUILD THE FENCE PERSON THAT WALKS THROUGH MY HOUSE, ALWAYS BY IT, I CAN, I'M GONNA SEND SAMPLES TO YOU, SIR, THAT YOU SEE, I DON'T EVEN HAVE A, A BUSINESS CARD.
I BUILD 10 BY MAIN STREET HERE, ONE ROYAL AVENUE IN DUNCANVILLE, 2015.
10 OF THEM IS A SMALL CIRCLE LIKE THIS, EVEN AT BANKS HIRE ME TO BUILD, I SAID YOU ONE IN THE SUR 2 0 8 WEST PLEASANT RUN.
YOU'VE ALREADY ANSWERED MY QUESTION.
SO ONE QUESTION THAT I HAVE IS, HOW DO YOU PREVENT INVESTORS FROM PURCHASING ALL OF YOUR PROPERTIES? I MEAN, THAT'S, THAT'S, I WANT, I'M, THIS MIGHT BE AN OPTION, APPEALING OPTION IF IT'S OWNER OCCUPIED.
I'M NOT INTERESTED IN AN INVESTOR COMING UP AND BUYING ALL 27 OF THEM AND LEASING THEM OUT.
SO HOW DO YOU PREVENT THAT? AND I DON'T KNOW, CITY MANAGER, IS THERE SOMETHING IN THERE? I KNOW WHEN WE DID THE RANCH, WE PUT IN STIPULATIONS THAT, THAT THERE COULDN'T BE, IS THERE SOMETHING LIKE THAT WE COULD DO HERE TO PREVENT THEM FROM BECOMING INVESTOR OWNED PROPERTY? IT DID.
THAT SITUATION DID REQUIRE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
AND OF COURSE, IN, UM, CITY PARTICIPATION, UM, COULD WE ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPER TO SELL TO, UM, OWNER OCCUPIED? ABSOLUTELY.
UM, UNFORTUNATELY, AFTER THAT FIRST SELL, IT'S NOT GUARANTEED.
'CAUSE IT CAN BE SECOND GENERATION SALES TO INVESTMENT COMPANY.
IT'S NOT GUARANTEED I CAN SELL IT TO OWNER OCCUPANTS TODAY, TOMORROW THE BUYER, MAYBE LOSSES IS JOB OR GET LAID OFF.
THEY WANT TO SAVE THEIR INVESTMENT.
EITHER THEY LEASE IT OUT OR THEY SELL IT.
SO UNDER THAT CONDITION, I DON'T HAVE ANY CONTROL IN ANY SUBDIVISION.
EVEN WHERE SINGLE FAMILY ARE, THE SAME THING HAPPENS.
YOU CAN'T GUARANTEE THAT THE PERSON WHO BODY IS GONNA LIVE THERE FOREVER.
THAT, THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO KNOW.
I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
I I HAVE A COUPLE OBSERVATIONS.
UM, WHEN I LOOKED AT THIS, I'M OKAY WITH THE CHANGE, UH, OF, OF ZONING.
UM, IT PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOUNGER HOMEOWNERS TO PURCHASE.
I, I ALSO UNDERSTAND AND HAVE THE SAME APPREHENSION OF A DEVELOPER COMING IN AND PURCHASING ALL.
UM, I ALSO JUST WANNA FOCUS ON THE INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THIS LOCATION.
THERE'S ONE LOCATION, ONE INTEREST, ONE EXIT.
AND WHILE YOU'RE DOING THE LEFT J TURN COMING SOUTH, GOING NORTH, THERE IS NO, UM, ADDITIONAL ROADWAY FOR SOMEONE TO PULL OVER AND THEN TURN IN.
UM, JOE WILSON IS A HIGHLY TRAVELED ROAD, AM AND PM IT IS PACKED.
UH, WE'VE HAD CHALLENGES WITH SPEEDING.
WE HAVE A LIGHT THAT IS COMING IN TRAFFIC LIGHT TO HELP MODERATE THE LEVEL OF SPEED.
BUT WHEN I LOOK AT HOW YOU ENTER AND HOW YOU EXIT THIS LOCATION, IT LOOKS CHALLENGING.
UM, THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO WIDEN THE SIDEWALKS SO THAT WHEN YOU WALK UP JOE WILSON, IT'S FOUR FOOT SIDEWALKS.
IT'S VERY NARROW AND MOST OF THOSE SIDEWALKS HAVE BUSHES.
SO IT MAKES THIS VERY DIFFICULT.
I CAN SEE HOW THIS CAN BE AN ENLIVENED INTERSECTION WHEN YOU GO SOUTH AND CREATING WALKABILITY TO DAIRY QUEEN TO WALMART, UM, NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET TO ALDI TO ANY OF THOSE ESTABLISHMENTS.
SO I CAN SEE WHERE THIS FITS, BUT I UNDERSTAND THE APPREHENSION.
UM, I DID HAVE A QUESTION ALSO.
THIS IS 55% MASONRY YOU AT THE TIME.
ONE TIME WE WERE ABLE TO DICTATE, YOU KNOW, THE AMOUNT OF MASONRY, UM, COULD YOU GO HIGHER TO 85%, WHICH WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH OUR SCORECARD, RESIDENTIAL SCORECARD.
[01:15:01]
HAVING A, THERE'S THREE MODELS CORRECT THERE, UM, IN 27 UNITS.SO IT'S GONNA REPEAT EVERY NINE TIMES.
IS THERE A WAY TO INCREASE THE SELECTION SO THAT THERE IS A GREATER A, A, UM, LESS MONOTONY, LESS, UM, REPEATING OF, OF THE MODELS? BECAUSE ACROSS FROM EACH OTHER YOU CAN HAVE TWO THAT LOOK THE SAME, BUT THERE'LL BE IN DIFFERENT STAGES.
SO LOOKING FOR REDUCING THE MONOTONY, IS THAT SOMETHING WHERE YOU CAN CHANGE THE DESIGNS FOR A GREATER VARIETY? THAT IS POSSIBLE.
UM, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I JUST WANTED TO UM, CLARIFY.
ACCORDING TO THE CONCEPT PLAN, THE SETBACK FROM THE FENCE LINE IS 25 FEET IN THE CONCEPT PLAN.
THE REAR IN THIS, YOU HAVE TO TAKE A PICTURE AND YOU MIGHT WANNA REQUEST CLARIFICATION FROM THE APPLICANT, BUT THE CONCEPT PLAN HAS A 25 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE FENCE LINE.
YOU HAVE TO TAKE A PICTURE AND ZOOM IN.
IS THAT CORRECT SIR? VERY SMALL.
IT'S A 25 FEET IN THE REAR RUNS AND REAR 15 FEET.
THE REAR SAYS 25, THE REAR SAYS 25.
YEAH, MAYBE WITH THE EASEMENT IT'S EVEN LONGER, BUT EAST.
SO, UM, I THINK JUST TO REITERATE, OUR CITY MANAGER'S, UM, INFORMATION, THE REAR YARD SET THAT IT HAS A MINIMUM OF 15 UH, FEET FOR THE PD REQUIREMENT.
THE CONCEPT PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET.
AND SO WHAT THEY HAVE SHOWN IS A PART OF WHAT THEY CAN DEVELOP, THEY CAN ACHIEVE 25 FEET FOR THE REAR YARD.
AND WHAT I CLARIFY 'CAUSE I HAD, I'VE HEARD DIFFERENT THINGS.
ALRIGHT, COUNCIL MEMBER MCCURDY.
ALRIGHT, SO, UM, ON LOOKING AT, I'M LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN.
SO LOOKING AT BUILDING B, THE, THE SIDE OF THAT BUILDING ACTUALLY IS ABUTTING SOME OF THE, THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
AND IT LOOKS TO BE CLOSER THAN, THAN WHAT THE SETBACK IS IN THE REAR OF BUILDING A OR EVEN THE REAR OF THAT BUILDING.
SO, SO THAT ONE BUILDING IS FACING, YOU KNOW, HA HAS TWO FACADES THAT ARE FACING THE, UH, ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY.
IT HAS BOTH THE, THE REAR AND, AND THE ONE SIDE NEXT TO HOA LOT TWO.
SO, I MEAN, I WOULD JUST, I I WOULD REALLY LIKE SOME MORE CLARIFICATION ON EXACTLY WHERE THE STRUCTURES ARE GONNA BE, UM, AS IT RELATES TO THE SURROUNDING HOMES BECAUSE I, YOU KNOW, I JUST, MY, MY PERSONAL PO POSITION IS, YOU KNOW, I I I'M NOT OPPOSED TO, TO THE REZONING, BUT IF I HAD BOUGHT ONE OF THOSE HOMES, MY EXPECTATION IS THAT YOU'RE GONNA HONOR THE ZONING THAT'S THERE AND YOU'RE GONNA HONOR THE SETBACKS AND THE RESTRICTIONS THAT WERE ON THAT ZONING AND THE RESTRICTIONS THAT WERE ON THAT PREVIOUS ZONING WERE 30 FEET.
AND SO IT, YOU KNOW, IN, IN MY MIND, ANY STRUCTURE THAT'S GONNA BE ON THIS PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 30 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.
UM, YOU'RE, YOU'RE WITHIN THE, THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, SAME HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, BUT I, I, I'M JUST, I'M NOT COMFORTABLE WITH THE STRUCTURES BEING CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY LINES THAN WHAT WAS IN THE PREVIOUS ZONING.
WELL, I'M NOT SURE IT'S FIVE FEET ON, ON THIS, ON THIS ONE SIDE.
IT, IT, IT, IT'S HARD TO TELL LOOKING AT THIS 'CAUSE THERE'S NO MEASUREMENTS ON HERE FROM PLANNING DIRECTOR.
IF I CAN, WELL, LET ME DIRECT DIRECTOR SOUTH, COULD YOU PROVIDE SOME CLARITY AND THEN I HAVE SOME COMMENTS.
TIM, MAY I ASK IF THE CITY SECRETARY BRINGS BACK THE CONCEPT PLANS FROM MY PRESENTATION? YES.
AND SO I'M NOT SURE IF WE'RE, SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT LOOK AT, AT AT BUILDING B THERE AND HOA LOT TWO BUILDING B.
THAT, THAT DOES THAT NOT, UM, ABUT THE ADJOINING COMMUNITY? IT DOES, YES.
AND THAT, THAT APPEARS TO BE CLOSER.
SO ARE WE SAYING THAT THE, THE MINIMUM SETBACK TO ANY OF THE FENCE LINES IS GONNA BE 25 FEET? SO THE PD STANDARDS STATE THAT THERE'S A MINIMUM OF 15 FOOT SETBACK REQUIRED.
THE CONCEPT PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET.
UM, AS, UM, THERE ARE SOME, I WOULD HAVE TO UNFORTUNATELY ZOOM
[01:20:01]
IN TO SEE, UH, WHAT THE DIMENSIONS ARE IF THEY ARE MARKED, UM, UM, FOR BUILDING B.BUT I SEE 25, UH, AS THE MEASUREMENT THAT'S SHOWN THERE.
UM, THERE IS A UTILITY EASEMENT THAT WOULD, WOULD LIMIT THE ABILITY OF THOSE BUILDINGS TO GO ANY CLOSER TO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
SO THE BUILDINGS COULD NOT BE LOCATE LOCATED WITHIN THAT EASEMENT.
IF, IF WE'RE WILLING TO SAY THAT THERE WILL BE NO STRUCTURE CLOSER THAN 25 FEET TO ANY FENCE LINE.
SO LET ME SUMMARIZE THIS, BUT, BUT I, I WOULD WANT THAT SPECIFIED IN, IN THE PD.
ALRIGHT, SO LET'S, LET ME SUMMARIZE THIS AS WE GO FORWARD TONIGHT WE HAVE A PD CASE FOR ZONING AND A PLAN DEVELOPMENT.
SO WE ASK, COUNSEL CAN DENY OR APPROVE AND WE CAN APPROVE WITH AMENDMENTS TO THE PD.
SO IF THAT IS YOUR DESIRE TO INCLUDE THAT MINIMUM AND OUR DESIRE TO INCLUDE THE, UM, IMPROVEMENTS IN MASONRY AND, AND NONNO MONOGAMOUS MONOTONY, WE CAN DO SO.
AND THE APPLICANT WILL DECIDE IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT HE WANTS TO DO.
SO I, I'VE HEARD THE PRESENTATION FROM CITY STAFF AND CITY STAFF WENT THROUGH GREAT DETAIL ON MULTIPLE POINTS AND THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AND, UH, I, I HEARD, UH, COUNCILMAN MCCURDY'S, UH, CONCERN ABOUT THE 30 FEET, BUT HE SAID HE WOULD BE WILLING.
SO IF WE COULD, I WOULD MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE ZONING WITH A CLEARLY STIPULATED THAT THE REAR IS 25 AT MINIMUM, 25 FEET, ALL ALL AROUND, ALL AROUND.
THAT'S MY MOTION WITH ALL THE STIPULATIONS THAT WERE RECOMMENDED BY CITY STAFF AND ADDITIONAL MINIMUM OF 25 ALL AROUND.
ALRIGHT, AND DO WE HAVE A, I'LL SECOND THAT.
AND ALSO WOULD YOU ADD THE NON MONOTONY STANDARD TO THAT ALSO, SIR? PARDON ME? THE NON MONOTONY STANDARD? YES.
ALRIGHT, SO LET'S RECAPITULATE FOR THE RECORD, COULD YOU PRESENT THAT MOTION AGAIN, SIR? SO I MADE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL WITH ALL THE STIPULATIONS MENTIONED BY STAFF AND THE NON MONOTONOUS STANDARDS AND THE MINIMUM 25 FEET SETBACK.
AND THE REASON WHY I SAY THAT, UH, WHAT SIR, ON THE ZONING ON THE SIDE IS 30 FEET.
SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FIVE FEET AND, AND, AND I HEARD STAFF ANYWAY, ENOUGH SAID YES AND THE NON MONOTONY STANDARD I DID SAY THAT.
SO FOR CASE NUMBER PD 6 88 2 0 2 4, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COUNCIL MEMBER SIMS AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCURDY.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.
THOSE OPPOSED? THIS IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
I, I THINK STAFF NEEDS CLARIFICATION.
ON THE 25 FOOT REAR SETBACK, IT'S ALL THE WAY, ALL THE WAY AROUND FROM THE FRONT YARD AS WELL? NO, NO.
REAR FROM THE PROPERTY LINE FROM ON ALL REAR, REAR, REAR AND INSIDE OR JUST REAR? REAR INSIDE.
WELL I THOUGHT IT WAS REAR INSIDE.
THAT'S THE SIDE OF THE PROPERTY ABOVE THAT.
OKAY, BECAUSE I HEARD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR SAY 25 FEET REAR DID.
IS THAT CORRECT? YES, OF COURSE.
I HEARD YOUR MOTION AS AN APPROVAL OF A 25 FOOT REAR SETBACK.
WITH, UH, ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION TO AVOID MONOTONY YES.
IN THE, UH, ELEVATIONS AND ALL YOUR PREVIOUS RECORDS AND ALL THE OTHER PREVIOUS, UM, YES.
CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED.
DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? CITY MANAGER? YES.
I I I DO NOT SECOND THAT THEN.
ALRIGHT, SO I, I WANTED 25 FEET ON ON THE OKAY.
ON THE, ON THAT SIDE ALSO ADJOINING THE BODY PROPERTY.
[01:25:01]
COUNCILWOMAN.NA UH, I JUST WANT ALSO FOR A POINT OF CLARIFICATION, UH, ALONG THE LINES OF COUNCILMAN MCCURDY, WOULD THE, WOULD IT BE CORRECT TO SAY THAT WE WOULD WANT THIS RESTRICTION FOR THE REAR WHERE THERE ARE HOMES A ABUTTING, UH, HOMES, THE BACK OF OTHER HOMES? BECAUSE IT'S REALLY ONLY A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WHERE THERE ARE OTHER HOMES THAT ARE DIRECTLY BEHIND.
I JUST SAID 25 REAR ACROSS THE BOARD.
SO THAT WOULD APPLY WHETHER IT'S HOMES BEHIND IT OR NOT.
HOMES, IT'S JUST, FOR ME, IT'S, I WAS TRYING TO MAKE IT EASY FOR STAFF.
ALRIGHT, SO THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION.
ALRIGHT, SO CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE AGENDA ITEM? NO HOLD.
WE RECONSIDER THE AGENDA ITEM SO THAT COUNCIL MEMBER SIMS CAN, CAN MAKE THE, UH, ADJUSTMENTS AND SOMEBODY ELSE CAN SECOND THAT.
ALRIGHT, ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR OF A RECONSIDERATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM.
THOSE OPPOSED, THIS IS A LITTLE WEIRD.
THAT'S A LITTLE WEIRD, BUT IT PASSES SIX TO ONE.
ALRIGHT, SO LET'S GET BACK ON TRACK WITH THIS.
AND COUNCIL MEMBER SIMS, WOULD YOU LIKE TO RESTATE YOUR, SO I, I'M BASING IT ON THE PRESENTATION THAT I RECEIVED FROM PROFESSIONAL STAFF THAT THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH SEVERAL STIPULATIONS.
UH, THE MODIFICATION IS THAT THERE WOULD BE 25 FOOT REAR SETBACK.
AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CURRENT ZONING IS 30.
SO YOU'RE TALKING FOR ME IT'S FIVE FEET, FIVE FEET DIFFERENCE AND I'M OKAY WITH THAT.
UH, WHAT'S YOUR LANGUAGE? UH, NON MONOTONY.
UH, THE FACADE OF THE YES NON MONOTONY.
'CAUSE THE APPLICANT AGREED TO THAT.
THAT TO ME MAKES IT A MORE, UH, PALATABLE, UH, PROJECT.
WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER SIMS. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? ALL SECOND.
WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN NAZE.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.
THOSE OPPOSED? THE MOTION IS APPROVED.
AND NOW WHERE ARE WE? WE ARE ON, UM,
[b. Case No. PD-771-2026 – Conduct a public hearing and consider an application for an amendment to PD District No. 2005-226 [Hillside Village] to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption in conjunction with “restaurants” in tenant spaces with a previously approved CUP, on property zoned PD Ordinance No. 2005-226 on approximately 43.295 acres, generally located south of East Pleasant Run Road and west of North J. Elmer Weaver Freeway, with the approximate address being 305 West FM Road 1382. Applicant and Property Owner: Lloyd Sova, PREP Hillside Real Estate, LLC]
AGENDA ITEM SIX, CASE NUMBER PD 7 71 20 26.CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO PD DISTRICT NUMBER 2 0 0 5 DASH 2 26 JOSE VILLAGE TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION IN CONJUNCTION WITH RESTAURANTS AND TENANT SPACES WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CUP ON PROPERTY.
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF EAST PLEASANT RUN ON WEST OF NORTH J ELMER WEAVER FREEWAY WITH THE APPROXIMATE ADDRESS BEING 3 0 5 WEST FM ROAD 1382.
AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE ANOTHER STAFF PRESENTATION DOC.
OUR NEXT CASE, IT'S PD 7 7 1 20 26 AND THIS IS THE PD AMENDMENT FOR HILLSIDE VILLAGE.
UH, JUST AS A THANK YOU TO CITY COUNCIL, THE STRATEGIC PRIORITIES HAVE GUIDED THIS APPLICATION.
UH, THEY REALLY TOUCH ON THE PRIORITIES RELATED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
I WANTED TO NOTE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL'S STRATEGIC PLAN, UH, IDENTIFIES THIS AS A HIGH IMPACT ACTION ITEM FOR THE UPTOWN AREA, SPECIFICALLY ITEMS ONE B, SUPPORTING ECONOMIC VITALITY OF HILLSIDE VILLAGE AND CONTINUING TO STRENGTHEN THE RELATIONSHIP AND PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY AND PRAYER FRUIT AND ONE C, ENSURING LONG-TERM PROPERTY ECONOMIC VITALITY BY SUPPORTING STREAMLINED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES THROUGH MODIFYING PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS, UH, TO ALLOW FOR RESTAURANTS WITH ALCOHOL FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION BY RIGHTS.
IN ADDITION, THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL ANNUAL WORK PLAN ALSO IDENTIFIES ITS AREA'S HIGH IMPACT AS AN ACTION ITEM FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR THE UPTOWN AREA, SPECIFICALLY FOCUSED ON EXPLORING AND PRESENTING OPPORTUNITIES TO STREAMLINE DEVELOPMENT
[01:30:01]
PROCESSES FOR BUSINESS PROSPECTS IN HILLSIDE VILLAGE AND CONSIDERING, UH, SECOND GENERATION TENANTS IN BUSINESS SPACES AND ALLOWING THEM FOR ON-PREMISE, UH, CONSUMPTION FOR ALCOHOL AS A MEANS OF EXPEDITING THE PROCESS THAT IS CURRENTLY REQUIRED.JUSTICE ORIENTATION SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST PLEASANT RUN ROAD BETWEEN CEDAR HILL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 67.
THE REQUEST IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO PD ORDINANCE NUMBER SEA ROW FIVE DASH 2 26 TO ALLOW FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION IN CONJUNCTION WITH RESTAURANTS AND TENANT SPACES WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CUP.
THE AREA OF CONSIDERATION IS THE AREA HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW, AND THOSE ARE THE PROPERTIES THAT WOULD BE, UM, IMPACTED BY THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST.
THE CURRENT ZONING AND SURROUNDING LAND USAGE ARE SHOWN ON THIS MAP.
GENERALLY, THE AREA IS SURROUNDED BY DEVELOPED PROPERTIES THAT INCLUDE, UM, RAILROAD, CRESTVIEW, COURT, NURSING HOME, THE WEST MIDTOWN DISTRICT, A MIX OF RETAIL, RESTAURANT AND PERSONAL SERVICE USES THE TARGET SHOPPING CENTER WITH A MIX OF RETAIL, RESTAURANT AND PERSONAL SERVICE USES AS WELL.
SO THE TENANT SPACES THAT CURRENTLY HAVE AN APPROVED CUP ARE SHOWN HERE ON THIS MAP.
THESE SEVEN SUITES WOULD BE THOSE THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED TO MOVE FORWARD AS SECOND GENERATION, UH, LOCATIONS.
SO ANY ADDITIONAL TENANT SPACES OR EXPANSION INTO ADDITIONAL TENANT SPACES WILL REQUIRE A CUP TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.
TO RESTATE THAT, IF ANY TENANT SPACES THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP COME FORWARD WITH A REQUEST FOR CUP FOR ALCOHOL ON PREMISE CONSUMPTION, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL IF ANY OF THESE, UH, SUITES EXPANDED INTO A SECONDARY SUITE.
SO IF THEY GET LARGER, THEY WOULD ALSO HAVE TO COME FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR A CUP.
SO SECTION 4.14 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE WILL STILL APPLY.
A NEW TENANT OR OPERATOR FOR A TENANT SPACE WITH AN APPROVED CUP WILL BE REQUIRED TO STILL SUBMIT THE SAME REVIEW DOCUMENTS, THE SAME SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT'S LISTED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UH, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CO FOR STAFF REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
SO IT WOULD BECOME MORE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM.
CITY COUNCIL WILL STILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO REVOKE A CUP FOR FAILURE, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY OF THE TERMS IN THIS SECTION AND OTHER APPLICABLE ORDINANCES.
AND ALSO THE CITY ATTORNEY MAY INFORM TABC THAT A LOCATION IS NO LONGER IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCES AS PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED BY THE CITY SECRETARY AND REQUEST TABC TO TAKE ACTION.
SO FOR ITEMS LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, UH, CHANGES IN THE SITE PLAN, PARKING SIGN, ALL THOSE THINGS WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD REVIEW.
UH, AND IF THERE WERE CHANGES THE APPLICANT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO, UM, TO RESPOND TO STAFF CONSIDERATION AND CONCERN ABOUT THOSE ITEMS. FOR THE INTERIOR DESIGN AND FLOOR PLAN, UH, THE APPLICANT WILL STILL BE REQUIRED TO IDENTIFY WHERE ALCOHOL WILL BE SERVED AND WHERE IT WILL BE STORED.
FOR ESTIMATED REVENUES, WE STILL HAVE TO SHOW THAT THERE WAS A 60% MINIMUM OF GROSS ANNUAL SALES FROM PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, EXCLUDING ALCOHOL AND THE HOURS OF OPERATION WOULD STILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE.
THOSE ARE LIMITED FROM 11:00 AM TO 1:00 AM THESE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE, UH, IDENTIFIED HERE WOULD STILL APPLY AND THE TABC LICENSING REQUIREMENTS WOULD STILL APPLY.
AND FINALLY, UH, OPERATORS WOULD STILL HAVE TO PROVIDE A QUARTERLY AFFIDAVIT LISTING THEIR GROSS SALES AND THEIR SALES OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION SIGNED AND NOTARIZED.
AS A PART OF OUR TYPICAL PROCESS, WE'VE SEEN THAT THIS USUALLY TAKES THREE TO FOUR MONTHS.
WE ANTICIPATE THAT THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD REDUCE THAT TIME TO ONE MONTH.
AND SO JUST TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE STEPS, STEP ONE IS USUALLY A-C-C-U-P APPLICATION AND THAT WOULD BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS.
THE PROPOSED PROCESS WOULD REQUIRE A CO SO THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPLICATION THAT WOULD, UH, REDUCE THE REQUIREMENT TO HAVE STAFF REVIEW OF A CUP APPLICATION.
UH, WE WOULD NOT HAVE TO, UH, PUBLICLY NOTIFY THESE UH, REQUESTS.
WE WOULD NOT HAVE TO PREPARE STAFF REPORTS OR, UH, PRESENT THESE ITEMS AT PUBLIC HEARINGS.
UH, THAT WOULD SAVE APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS.
WE WOULD STILL REQUIRE THAT THE TABC APPLICATION BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY SECRETARY FOR SIGNATURES.
UH, WE WOULD STILL REQUIRE A REVIEW OF ALL OF THE APPLICATIONS DOCUMENTS, AS I'VE MENTIONED BEFORE, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THAT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
[01:35:01]
WOULD ONLY BE PROVIDED AFTER ALL INSPECTIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.SO ONCE STAFF HAS DETERMINED A COMPLETE SUBMITTAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED, WE WOULD THEN DIRECT THEM TO COMPLETE THEIR TABC APPLICATION AND THE CITY WOULD SIGN OFF ON THAT APPLICATION.
AGAIN, THIS WILL REDUCE THE CITY'S APPROVAL PROCESS FOR NEW TENANTS AND OR OPERATORS FOR APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS.
AND SO AS A REMINDER, THIS TYPICAL CUP PROCESS IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CHANGE IN OPERATOR, UH, LET ALONE CHANGE IN RESTAURANT ITSELF.
WE DID REVIEW THIS AGAINST THE ZONING FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION, AND SO THAT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED AS A PART OF YOUR PACKET.
AND WE ALSO LOOKED AT THE CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH DOESN'T SPEAK SPECIFICALLY TO THIS PARTICULAR ITEM, BUT IT DOES IDENTIFY THAT, UH, MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENTS ALONG 67 AND LOOP NINE.
THERE ARE REGIONAL DESTINATIONS FOR RETAIL.
UM, AND SO THAT'S A PART OF THIS.
UH, THE GOAL IS TO ENHANCE THE RETAIL ENVIRONMENT AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR RESTAURANTS TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN HILLSIDE VILLAGE.
WE DID NOTIFY THIS ITEM IN THE RAMBLER, TEXAS MEDIA ON MAY 2ND.
WE ALSO SENT OUT 24 NOTIFICATIONS WITHIN 200 FEET TO PROPERTY OWNERS.
THERE WAS NOT A NOTIFICATION SENT TO A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION OR NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
THERE'S NOT ONE IDENTIFIABLE IN THE AREA.
AND AS A 5:00 PM TODAY, WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY LETTERS OF SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION.
AS A NOTE, UM, THERE IS ONGOING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE PREP GROUP.
UH, THEY MEET GENERALLY APPROXIMATELY TWO TIMES A MONTH.
AND SO THERE STILL WILL BE OPPORTUNITY TO COMMUNICATE, UH, ACTIVITY WITHIN HILLSIDE VILLAGE.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED AMENDMENT AND EXHIBITS PLAN COMMISSION ALSO RECOMMENDED APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED AMENDMENT AND EXHIBITS.
AND BASED ON AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ZONING CHANGE FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION, THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PRESENT.
UH, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, THANK YOU, DIRECTOR SELF.
WE WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THIS PUBLIC HEARING FOR, EXCUSE ME.
UM, YES, WE'RE GOING TO O OPEN UP THIS PUBLIC HEARING.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR AGAINST PD? 7 71 DASH 2 0 2 6.
APPROACH AND YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD? YES, SIR.
BEFORE I START, MAYOR, ONE THING I WOULD SUGGEST HISTORICALLY THE MAYOR WOULD HAVE, OH, THEY WOULD HAVE THESE TWO HEARINGS SEPARATE SO THAT WAY IT WOULD BE, IN OTHER WORDS, YOU'D HAVE ALL THE PACKAGES FOR HERE AND THEN THE OTHER PACKAGES THAT WOULD BE AGAINST IN ANOTHER SECTION, NOT WHERE IT'S JUST MIXED TOGETHER.
AND I THINK IF YOU LOOK AT THE RECORD HISTORICALLY OF CEDAR HILL, THAT THEY USED TO DO THAT AND I THINK IT WOULD SERVE Y'ALL WELL IF Y'ALL DID THAT ALSO.
I LIVE AT 1130 NORTH CEDAR HILL ROAD.
I'M FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA AND UM, I GUESS YOU COULD SAY, UH, I'M REALLY NOT AGAINST IT.
I'M AGAINST THE PART WHERE IT'S FOR 43 ACRES AND THAT THEY NEED TO EXPAND THIS TO WHERE IT'S THE 22,912 ACRES IN CEDAR HILL TO WHERE THIS WOULD BE THERE.
BECAUSE HISTORICALLY, I, UH, DIDN'T HAVE A PACK.
I HAD A PACKAGE, UH, BEER LICENSE, AND I UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS, WHAT IT GOES THROUGH TO GET, GET A LICENSE, BUT IT USED TO BE THE CITY COUNCIL DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT.
IT WAS AN ACADEMIC ITEM TO WHERE, UH, DISTANCES AND EVERYTHING AND IF THE ZONING WAS CORRECT THAT IT WOULD JUST GO ON IN.
AND I THINK IT WOULD SERVE Y'ALL WELL TO EXPLORE THAT BECAUSE Y'ALL HAVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS COME UP HERE SEVERAL TIMES AND EVERY TIME YOU HAVE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, YOU CHANGE THE ZONING.
AND WHAT I'VE SEEN IN THESE CHANGE OF ZONINGS AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS IS THAT DEGRADES THOSE ZONING THERE EVEN WHERE PROPERTY THAT I CONTROL OR I'M IN CHARGE OF AND UM, IT'S NOT REALLY FAIR TO THOSE PEOPLE.
HISTORICALLY, WHEN THE COUNTRY WAS SET UP THAT IT, UH, WE WERE A COUNTRY OF LAWS.
AND IT SEEMS THAT EVERY TIME THAT SOMETHING LIKE THIS COMES UP, THAT Y'ALL JUST CHANGE IT.
LIKE I SAYS, I'M NOT REALLY AGAINST THIS, BUT I THINK Y'ALL NEED TO EXPAND IT TO WHERE IT'S ALL CEDAR HILL AND IT'S JUST AN ACADEMIC ITEM OF WHERE, BECAUSE WHAT Y'ALL ARE DOING IS LISTENING TO WHAT STAFF SAYS AND THEN APPROVING IT.
AND THESE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS, IT DEGRADES, PARDON ME? UH, IT, IT DEGRADES DE WHOEVER HAS THEIR PHONE, COULD THEY TURN THE VOLUME DOWN PLEASE?
[01:40:01]
THANK YOU.IN OTHER WORDS, IT DEGRADES THE ZONING.
AND HISTORICALLY, THE LAST BUILDING THAT I BUILT, BASICALLY THE, UH, CITY, UM, UH, CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR SENT THE LETTER TO ME AND IT SAID THAT I WAS FOLLOWED THE ZONING OR THE ORDINANCES TO THE T AND IT'S LIKE RIGHT NOW IT'S JUST EVERYTHING'S, IN OTHER WORDS, I FOLLOWED THE THINGS TO THE T AND IF I COULD HAVE DONE IT BACK THEN, AND WHILE OTHER, UH, ITEMS OTHER PLACES WERE BEING BUILT, THEY DIDN'T FOLLOW WHAT I FOLLOWED.
SO I WOULD CONSIDER THAT Y'ALL EXPAND THE ACREAGE TO 22,912.
THAT'S THE AMOUNT OF ACRES THAT ARE IN CEDAR HILL OR THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT.
JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, YOU ARE, ARE FOR OR AGAINST? WELL, I'M A I'M.
I'M HERE SPEAKING ABOUT, I HAVE THAT OPTION TO SPEAK THAT I'M, I'M AGAINST.
I'M AGAINST THAT PART AND THAT THEY NEED TO EXPAND IT TO WHERE IT'S AN ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.
HAVE THE SAME OPPORTUNITY THAT THEY HAVE.
ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR AGAINST PD 7 71 DASH 2 0 2 6.
ANYONE ELSE LOOKING AT ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR AGAINST PD 7 71 DASH 0 2 2 6, NOT SEEING ANYONE ELSE APPROACH CLOSING THAT PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING? COUNSEL, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR A MOTION? I I DON'T HAVE A QUESTION.
JUST HAVE A COMMENT THAT, UM, THAT I THINK THIS IS, UH, I'M, I'M VERY HAPPY THAT THE STAFF IS DOING THIS.
I DID HAVE QUITE A FEW CLARIFICATIONS THAT I NEEDED TO BE, UH, MADE AND ONE OF THEM, UM, WAS THE FACT THAT WE STILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO REVOKE A CUP IF THERE IS AN ISSUE OR A FAILURE IN COMPLIANCE.
SO I THINK THAT THAT'S THE MAIN THING.
UH, APART FROM THAT, THIS IS VERY SMART, IT'S VERY PROGRESSIVE.
UM, IT'S EFFICIENT AND UM, IT GIVES A SHOT IN THE ARM TO WHAT WE'RE ABLE TO DO AS FAR AS BRINGING NEW BUSINESSES IN WHOM OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE THIS OBSTACLE OF GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS.
THE, THE, THE COST IN THE PROCESS INVOLVED, UM, IN PURSUING THIS.
AND, UM, I DO SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THIS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND I'M JUST HAPPY TO BE A PART OF, UH, A CITY WHO IS AHEAD OF THE GAME IN THIS WAY.
UM, AND, UM, LIMITING IT TO A, UH, REGIONAL RETAIL CENTER, UM, IS CERTAINLY THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
IS THAT A MOTION? SOUNDS LIKE A MOTION.
I WOULD MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE CASE NUMBER PD 7 7 1 2 0 2 6.
UM, AS WRITTEN SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN ZI.
AND WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER SIMS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR RAISE YOUR HAND.
THOSE OPPOSED? THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
[a. Discussion and consideration of all matters incident and related to the issuance and sale of "City of Cedar Hill, Texas, Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2026", including the adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-874, which authorizes the issuance of such certificates of obligation.]
BOND MATTERS DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF ALL MATTERS IN MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS COMBINATION TAX AND REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION SERIES 2 0 2 6, INCLUDING AN OPTION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2 0 2 6 DASH 8 74, WHICH AUTHORIZES THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH CERTIFICATES OF OBSERVATION OF OBLIGATION.AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE MARTY SHEEN, MARTHA SHEEN, MAYOR WITH HILLTOP SECURITIES.
WE REPRESENT THE CITY AS YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR HERE TO PRESENT THE RESULTS OF YOUR BOND SALE TODAY.
AND SPOILER ALERT, THEY WERE GREAT TO QUOTE YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM.
THAT'S WHAT YOU DO HERE AT THE CITY THOUGH, RIGHT? SO THAT'S NOT A SURPRISE.
UM, WE DID PREPARE THESE BOOKLETS, UH, FOR YOU WITH ALL OF THE PERTINENT DETAILS.
IF YOU LOOK BEHIND TAB A, UH, WE FIRST HAVE A, UH, THE RESULTS OF THE BIDS.
SO YOUR BONDS WERE SOLD THROUGH A COMPETITIVE SALE, AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS THEY WERE PUT OUT ON THE MARKET AND ANY AND ALL UNDERWRITERS WERE INVITED TO SUBMIT A BID FOR THE RIGHT TO PURCHASE AND SELL YOUR BONDS TO THE PUBLIC.
I'M PLEASED TO REPORT THE CITY RECEIVED EIGHT DIFFERENT PROPOSALS WOULD BE OKAY.
FINANCIAL SECURITIES COMING IN WITH THE LOWEST PROPOSED TRUE INTEREST COSTS OF 3.73%.
GIVE YOU AN IDEA, WE LIKE TO SEE A MINIMUM OF THREE BIDS.
THAT'S WHAT WE CONSIDER A SUCCESSFUL SALE.
SO WITH EIGHT, YOU KNOCKED IT OUT OF THE PARK, WELL ABOVE, UH, OUR MINIMUM STANDARDS.
[01:45:01]
UH, BEHIND THE BID RESULTS, WE HAVE INCLUDED A FULL SET OF THE FINAL NUMBERS FOR YOU.SO THE CITY IS RECEIVING $6.64 MILLION.
UM, THEY HAVE BEEN AMORTIZED OVER A 20 YEAR PERIOD.
WE WERE ABLE TO SHORTEN SOME OF THE PROJECT AMORTIZATIONS SO THAT IT COULD REDUCE YOUR INTEREST COSTS AND HIT YOUR TAX RATE TARGETS.
THERE IS NO ESTIMATED TAX IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS DEBT, SO NO TAX INCREASE.
AND BEHIND TAP B, WE HAVE GRAPHED THIS RATE AGAINST THE BOND BUYERS INDEX TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHERE THAT IS RELATIVE TO MARKET CONDITIONS.
RIGHT NOW, THE BOND BUYERS INDEX IS A THIRD PARTY INDEX THAT WE TYPICALLY USE TO TRACK MUNICIPAL MARKET CONDITIONS OVER TIME.
THEY RELEASE A WEEKLY RATE THAT WE FIGURE AS A BENCHMARK OR FACTOR.
THE CURRENT RELEASED RATE IS A 4.7%.
SO AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU'RE WELL BELOW THAT WITH A 3.73%.
THIS IS TESTIMONY TO THE STRONG CREDIT PROFILES.
THE CITY WITH EVERY BOND ISSUE.
THE, AS PART OF THE NORMAL BOND ISSUANCE PROCESS, YOU DO HAVE TO APPLY FOR IT AND PURCHASE A BOND RATING.
SO, UM, CITY STAFF HAD TO SIT DOWN, UH, WITH TWO RATING AGENCIES, S AND P GLOBAL AND MOODY'S.
THE CREDIT RATING AGENCIES ASK A LOT OF QUESTIONS.
STAFF HAS TO GO THROUGH A LOT OF DETAIL, PROVIDE A LOT OF INFORMATION SO THAT THEY CAN DO A FULL CREDIT ASSESSMENT ON THE CITY.
AND I'M ALSO PLEASED TO REPORT THAT BOTH FIRMS DID AFFIRM THE STRONG CREDIT RATINGS OF THE CITY S AND P AT, UM, A DOUBLE A PLUS.
I'M SORRY, DOUBLE A AND THEN MOODY'S AT A DOUBLE A ONE.
IT'S VERY SIGNIFICANT TO NOTE THAT YOU'RE ONLY TWO NOTCHES AWAY FROM A PERFECT SCORE FOR S AND P AND ONE NOTCH AWAY FROM A PERFECT SCORE ON MOODY'S.
THE CREDIT RATING IS SO IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT'S JUST LIKE YOU OR I OUR OWN PERSONAL CREDIT RATING.
THE HIGHER THE CREDIT RATING IS, THE LOWER THE COST OF BORROWING WHEN YOU GO TO APPLY FOR A MORTGAGE OR PURCHASE A CAR.
SO THE SAME HOLDS TRUE FOR THE CITY.
THE HIGHER THE CREDIT RATING, THE LOWER THE COST OF BORROWING AND THE LOWER THE INTEREST RATE YOU GET WHEN YOU GO TO THE BOND MARKET.
THEY, EACH RATING AGENCY DOES RELEASE A FULL REPORT.
UH, WE HAVE INCLUDED THOSE BEHIND THE LAST CAB FOR YOUR REVIEW.
UH, I'LL JUST HIGHLIGHT, UM, YOU KNOW, AS EXPECTED, THEY, UH, DO COMMEND THE CONSISTENT FINANCIAL STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CITY AS WELL AS THE MANAGEMENT.
THIS IS THE FINAL STEP OF THE BOND ISSUANCE PROCESS.
SO BY ADOPTING THE ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, YOU ARE EFFECTIVELY ACCEPTING THIS BID FOR THE BONDS, LOCKING THE RATES INTO PLACE, AND YOU WILL ACTUALLY RECEIVE THE MONEY ON, I'M SORRY, JULY 9TH.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
THANK YOU FOR THE GOOD NEWS COUNSEL, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, MOTION COUNCIL MEMBER, MCCURDY? UM, I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AND SO IF NO ONE ELSE HAS ANY, I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE AUTHORIZE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2 0 2 6 DASH 8 7 4, THE ISSUANCE OF COMBINATION TAX AND REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $6.845 MILLION FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEETING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER MCCURDY AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER, UH, MALONE.
THIS IS ORDINANCE NUMBER 2 0 2 6 DASH 8 74, AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS COMBINATION TAX AND REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION SERIES 2026, PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF SAID CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION BY THE LEVY OF AN TAX UPON TAX, ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY AND WITH A LIMITED PLEDGE OF THE CITY'S COMBINED WATERWORKS AND SEWER SYSTEM, PROVIDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE, PAYMENT, SECURITY SALE AND DELIVERY OF SAID CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, INCLUDING THE APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF A PAYING AGENT REGISTRAR AGREEMENT AND THE APPROVAL AND DISTRIBUTION OF A PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT PERTAINING THERETO AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AND AND, AND NOW THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
DO WE, DO WE NEED A VOTE OF RECORD ON THIS? WE HAD THE MOTION, RIGHT? SO NOW'S
[01:50:01]
THE VOTE.ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR HAND.
DID I MISS SOMETHING? THOSE OPPOSED THIS MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
[a. Conduct a public hearing to receive input on the proposed FY2027 budget for the Cedar Hill Crime Control Prevention District (CCPD).]
BUDGET MATTERS.CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT ON THE PROPOSED FY 2 0 27 BUDGET FOR THE CITY, FOR THE CEDAR HILL CRIME CONTROL PREVENTION DISTRICT.
AND WE HAD A PRESENTATION IN BRIEFING FOR, EXCUSE ME, WE HAD OUR DIRECTORS MEETING EARLIER TONIGHT AT FIVE 30 FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC AND THOSE WATCHING AT LINE AT HOME.
THE CCP WAS ORIGINALLY ESTABLISHED BY CEDAR HILL VOTERS IN NOVEMBER OF 2013.
THANKS TO ITS TRACK RECORD OF KEEPING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD SAFE.
OUR COMMUNITY OVERWHELMINGLY APPROVED A 15 YEAR EXTENSION IN NOVEMBER, 2017, SECURING THIS PROGRAM THROUGH 2032.
THIS IS THE DEDICATED EIGHT OF ASCENT SALES TAX FUND THAT TAKES THE PRESSURE OFF OUR LOCAL HOMEOWNERS BY FUNDING TARGETED PUBLIC SAFETY INITIATIVES OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL FUND.
THE CCPD PROVIDES AN EQUIVALENT RELIEF OF ROUGHLY 3 CENTS ON THE CITY'S PROPERTY TAX RATE.
IT IS A TEXTBOOK EXAMPLE OF THE SMART FISCAL STEWARDSHIP AND SERVANT LEADERSHIP WORKING HAND IN HAND TOGETHER.
SO NOW I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
DOES ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR? OPPOSITION OF THIS ITEM ONCE AGAIN, DOES ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR OPPOSITION OF THIS ITEM? ONE FINAL TIME.
IS ANY, DOES ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR? OPPOSITION OF THIS ITEM NOT SEEING ANYONE APPROACH.
I'LL CLOSE THAT PORTION OF THE MEETING.
THERE IS NO, NO ACTION NECESSARY.
[b. Consider adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-872, which approves and adopts the FY2027 budget for the Crime Control and Prevention District (CCPD).]
IS ITEM EIGHT B.UH, WE WOULD NOW CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2 0 2 6 DASH 8 72, WHICH APPROVES AND ADOPTS THE FY 2 0 2 7 BUDGET FOR THE CRIME CONTROL AND THE PREVENTION DISTRICT.
I'M TRYING TO MAKE IT, OH, I'M SORRY SIR.
UH, MAYOR PROAM, MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 26 8 7 2 APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 2027 BUDGET FOR THE CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT CCPD.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND PATTY REPRESENTATIVE.
UM, COUNCIL MEMBER BEHAR, UH, PATTY BEHAR BEHAR.
UM, AND SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND WE HAVE A SECOND FOR ORDINANCE NUMBER 2 0 2 6 DASH 87, WHICH APPROVES AND ADOPTS THE FY 2 0 2 7 BUDGET FOR THE CRIME CONTROLLED AND PREVENTION DISTRICT.
THIS IS ORDINANCE NUMBER 2 2 0 2 6 8 7 2.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR, BEGINNING OCTOBER 1ST, 2026 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2027.
PROVIDING THAT EXPENDITURES FOR SAID FISCAL YEARS SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID BUDGET APPROPRIATING AND SETTING ASIDE THE NECESSARY FUNDS OF THE DISTRICT'S REVENUE FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE DISTRICT FOR VARIOUS ACTIVITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF THE DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH, CITY SECRETARY.
THOSE IN FAVOR? THOSE OPPOSED? THAT MOTION IS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
[9. Consent Agenda: The Consent Agenda includes routine items that may be acted upon with a single vote. Any council member may remove items from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion and consideration.]
IS THE CONSENT, UH, CONSENT AGENDA.I THESE ITEMS ARE ROUTINE AND MAY BE ACTED UPON WITH A SINGLE VOTE.
DO WE HAVE ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO WISH TO REMOVE? REMOVE AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
COUNCIL MEMBER MCCURDY? YES, I WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE ITEM E.
ALRIGHT, CONSENT AGENDA ITEM A CONSIDER APPROVING THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 19TH, 2026 SPECIAL CALL CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN MAY 26TH, 2026.
REGULAR COUN, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE, TO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
[01:55:01]
WITH GARVER LLC AND THEN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $240,000 TO CONDUCT LEAD SERVICE LINE.PREDICTIVE MODELING AS A CONTINUED ASSISTANCE WITH THE LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISION LCRR MANDATE AND THE LEAD AND COPPER RULE IMPROVEMENTS.
LCRI ISSUED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
ITEM C, CASE NUMBER FP 7 85 DASH 2026 APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S.
RECOMMENDATION AND APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PLAT FOR LAKERIDGE.
SECTION TWO TWO PHASE A LOT 1 8 1 6 RA PROPERTY ZONE SFE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ESTATE, ONE ACRE LOT MINIMUM LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BEING LOTS 1 8 1 6 AND LOT N 1 8 1 8 R DASH ONE LAKE RIDGE SECTION 22 PHASE A, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HARWICK DRIVE.
APPROXIMATELY 390 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HARTWICK HARTWICK DRIVE AND ALPS COURT WITH THE ADDRESS BEING 2 4 2 2 HARTWICK LANE AND 2 4 1 8 HARTWICK DRIVE.
APPLICANT TONY DELIA AND LISA HEITER BURNS SURVEYING PROPERTY OWNER STEPHANIE, HE AND DREAMBUILDER, LLC CASE NUMBER FP 7 8 3 DASH 2 2 6 APPROV IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S.
RECOMMENDATION AND APPLICATION FOR OUR FINAL PLAT FOR TEF EDITION.
NOT ONE BLOCK, ONE ON THE PROPERTY ZONE OT RES OLD TOWN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BEING A 0.114 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE JOSEPH MUNDINE SURVEY.
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH MAIN STREET, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH MAIN STREET AND COOPER STREET WITH THE ADDRESS BEING 3 2 3 SOUTH MAIN STREET.
APPLICANT MARIA REEN TOR TORRES KAHA KA I LOOKED IT UP.
KAJ PROPERTY OWNER MARIA REEN TORRES CARILLO.
I HOPE I'M SAYING THAT CORRECTLY AND I APOLOGIZE IF I'M NOT.
AND ALEXANDER ESCO ESL FADO ITEM F CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, A SHARED PARKING AND UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASEMENT COVENANT CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AGREEMENT WITH TOWN LAND COMPANY LLC EAST PENN PROPCO, LP AND ITEM G CONSIDERED THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2 0 2 6 8 DASH 8 73, WHICH AMENDS CHAPTER 15 OF THE CEDAR HILL CODE AVOIDANCES IN THE PARKS AND PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT.
THOSE ARE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. DO I HAVE A MOTION? COUNCIL MEMBER MALONE.
IF THERE IS NO QUESTIONS, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION.
YES, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION ON CONSIDER AGENDA ITEMS A THROUGH G EXCLUDING E FOR APPROVAL.
SO WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER OF LOAN AND THE SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER SIMS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
THOSE OPPOSED? THAT IS UNANIMOUS.
[e. Consider authorizing the Mayor to execute a lease agreement with the Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Chapter 240 for the use of shared nonprofit workspace within the City’s Fire Department Headquarters facility.]
MCCURDY, YOU PULLED ITEM EE THE FLOOR IS YOURS.ITEM, UM, ITEM E, CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DAV CHAPTER 2 4 0 FOR THE USE OF SHARED NONPROFIT SPACE WITHIN THE CITY'S FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS FACILITY.
DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS? YES.
GOOD EVENING, MAYOR PROTE GLOVER, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, CITY LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS ON BEHALF OF COMMANDER RAY JOHNSON AND THE MEMBERS OF THE DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS CHAPTER TWO 40.
WOULD Y'ALL PLEASE SEND THIS MOMENT REPRESENTS MORE THAN A REPORT OF ORGANIZATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS.
IT REFLECTS A CONTINUED PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN MUNICIPAL LEADERSHIP AND A VETERAN SERVICE ORGANIZATION COMMITTED
[02:00:01]
TO ADVANCING THE WELLBEING AND DIGNITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THOSE WHO HAVE SERVED OUR NATION SINCE ITS CHARTERING IN APRIL, 2021, DAV.CHAPTER TWO 40 HAS EXPERIENCED REMARKABLE GROWTH AND HAS BECOME A MODEL OF COMMUNITY-BASED VETERAN ADVOCACY AND SERVICE.
TODAY, OUR MONTHLY MEETINGS ROUTINELY WELCOME BETWEEN 120 TO 150 VETERANS, FAMILY MEMBERS, CAREGIVERS, AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS.
THESE MEETINGS FUNCTION AS EDUCATIONAL FORUMS, RESOURCE CENTERS AND SUPPORT NETWORKS WHERE VETERANS GAIN ACCESS TO CRITICAL INFORMATION AND SERVICES.
TOPICS GENERALLY ADDRESSED INCLUDE FUNERAL PRE-NEED PLANNING, VETERANS NATIONAL CEMETERY, BENEFITS, VETERANS TREATMENT, COURTS AID AND ATTENDANCE BENEFITS, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, VETERANS ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS, FINANCIAL AND ESTATE PLANNING, AND NUMEROUS OTHER SERVICES DESIGNED TO IMPROVE VETERANS LONG-TERM STABILITY AND WELLBEING.
FROM JANUARY THROUGH SEPTEMBER, 2025, CHAPTER TWO 40 MEMBERS CONTRIBUTED OVER 21,397 AND 0.5 VOLUNTEER SERVICE HOURS REPRESENTING AN INCREASE OF MORE THAN 15,280 HOURS OVER THE PREVIOUS YEARS.
FROM JANUARY THROUGH MAY OF 2026 ALONE, MEMBERS HAVE COMPLETED 15,569 VOLUNTEER SERVICE HOURS DISCRIMINATE DIS DIS DEMONSTRATING AN EXEC, UH, EXTRAORDINARY COMMITMENT TO COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND VETERAN ADVOCACY.
DURING 2025, CHAPTER 20 OF CHAPTER TWO 40, PROCESS MORE THAN 1800 COMPENSATION AND PENSION CLAIMS, INCLUDING SURVIVORS BENEFITS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETING 26 MILITARY, MILITARY DISCHARGE UPGRADES AND REFERRED OVER 487 VETERANS TO SPECIALIZED COMMUNITY AGENCIES CONDUCTED SEVEN CRITICAL PTSD RELATED CRISIS INTERVENTIONS AND REPRESENTED 10 VETERANS AT VETERANS TREATMENT COURTS IN BOTH ELLIS COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DALLAS AND DALLAS COUNTY.
THE CULTURE OF DAV CHAPTER TWO 40 IS ROOTED IN COMP, COMPASSION, AND SERVICE MEMBERS HAVE REPEATEDLY DEMONSTRATED THEIR COMMITMENT TO SUPPORTING FELLOW VETERANS DURING TIMES OF CRISIS.
IN ONE OF OUR NOTABLE EXAMPLES, UH, CHARTER, UH, CHAPTER MEMBERS COLLECTIVELY RAISED FUNDS DURING A SINGLE MEETING TO ASSIST A VETERAN IN SECURING THE RELEASE AND BURIAL OF HIS WIFE FROM METHODIST HOSPITAL.
THE CHAPTER ALSO SUCCESSFULLY HOSTED THE FIFTH ANNUAL VETERANS RESOURCE FAIR AND CLAIMS CLINIC SERVING OVER 223 ATTENDEES AND FACILITATING THE FILING OF 30 COMPENSATION CLAIMS. PLANNING IS CURRENTLY UNDERWAY FOR THE SIXTH ANNUAL, UM, VETERANS RESOURCE FAIR, WHICH WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER THE 26TH AT THE ALLEE SIMS, UM, RECREATION CENTER AND OUR VERY OWN MAYOR PRO TEMP, UM, GREGORY GLOVER WILL BE OUR KEYNOTE SPEAKER.
ADDITIONALLY, THE CHAPTER TWO 40 LAUNCHED ITS INAUGURAL VETERANS GALA, ATTRACTING MORE THAN 300 ATTENDEES, UM, ALSO ATTENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND GENERATED $12,616 TO SUPPORT VETERAN SERVICES, EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE AND SCHOLARSHIPS FOR VETERANS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS BEYOND VETERAN SPECIFIC INITIATIVES.
THE CHAPTER HAS ADOPTED COLLEGIATE PREP, COLLEGIATE ACADEMY, AND COLLEGIATE HIGH SCHOOL, PROVIDING GIFT CARDS, EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES AND SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS IN NEED.
CHAPTER MEMBERS HAS ALL HAVE ALSO SPONSORED THE COLLEGIATE HIGH SCHOOL PROM FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE YEARS AND HAVE COMMITTED TO, UH, THIS TRADITION IN 2027, RECOGNIZING THAT EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY REQUIRES SPECIALIZED TRAINING.
CHAPTER TWO 40 HOSTED THE DEPARTMENT OF TEXAS DAV ANNUAL SERVICE OFFICERS TRAINING WELCOMING 104 DAV MEMBERS FROM ACROSS THE STATE OF TEXAS.
DURING THIS EVENT, 22 NEW SERVICE OFFICERS FROM THE CHAPTER 20, UH, TWO 40 WERE CERTIFIED SIGNIFICANTLY EXPANDING THE STATE'S CAPACITY TO SERVE VETERANS.
WHAT BEGAN WITH ONLY 28 CHARTER MEMBERS IN 2021 HAS GROWN TO 503 MEMBERS AS OF MAY THE 20TH OF MAY OF 2026.
THIS GROWTH REFLECTS NOT ONLY ORGANIZATIONAL SUCCESS, BUT ALSO THE TRUST VETERANS PLACE.
IN CHAPTER TWO, FORTY'S LEADERSHIP COMMANDER RA C JOHNSON AND THE MEMBERS OF CHAPTER TWO 40 EXPRESS, PROFOUND GRATITUDE TO MAYOR MASON, THE CITY OF CITY HILL, UH, COUNCIL, AND FOR THEIR CONTINUOUS SUPPORT AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DEDICATED OFFICE SPACE WILL SIGNIFICANTLY ENHANCE OUR ABILITY
[02:05:01]
TO PROVIDE WALK-IN SERVICES.RIGHT NOW WE ONLY DO, UM, WE ONLY DO APPOINTMENTS ONLY BECAUSE OF LIMITED SPACES, BUT RIGHT NOW, ONCE WE GET THE SPACE, WE WILL BE ABLE TO DO WALK-IN SERVICES WHERE WE CAN, UM, HELP MORE VETERANS.
WE HAVE, UM, WE WILL CONTINUE TO WORK AND ENHANCE OUR, UM, STREAMLINE OUR CLAIMS PROCESS AND EXPAND PROGRAMMING OPPORTUNITIES.
THIS FACILITY WILL ALSO ENABLE THE CHAPTER TO HOST PTSD SUPPORT GROUPS, MILITARY SEXUAL TRAUMA SUPPORT SESSIONS, SUICIDE PREVENTION PROGRAMS, WHICH WE HAVE A SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINATOR.
WITHIN OUR CHAPTER, WE WILL BE ABLE TO HAVE GRIEF COUNSELING, UH, WORKSHOPS.
WE WILL HAVE EDUCATIONAL SEMINARS AND YOUTH FOCUSED INITIATIVES.
THESE SERVICES WILL, IS, WILL STRENGTHEN VETERANS, FAMILIES AND THE BROADER COMMUNITY WHILE REDUCING DEMANDS ON MUNICIPAL RESOURCES.
AS VETERAN LEADERS, WE UNDERSTAND THE RESPONSIBILITY ENTRUSTED IN US.
SO WE REMAIN COMMITTED TO ENSURING THAT NO VETERAN IS LEFT BEHIND AND THAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL WHO SERVED OUR NATION IS TREATED WITH DIGNITY, RESPECT, AND COMPASSION THROUGH SERVICE ADVOCACY AND COMMUNITY COLLABORATION.
CHAPTER TWO 40 CONTINUES TO FULFILL THIS MISSION OF IMPROVING THE LIVES OF VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES.
IN CLOSING, WE WANT TO OFFER A HEARTFELT THANKS TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL FOR INVESTING IN THOSE WHO HAVE SACRIFICED FOR OUR NATION.
TOGETHER WE ARE CREATING A STRONGER AND MORE SUB, UH, SUPPORTIVE COMMUNITY AND WHERE VETERANS CAN THRIVE AND CONTINUE TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE CITY THAT THEY PROUDLY CALL HOME.
AND I THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK.
IF Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M, I'M READY.
WILLING TO ANSWER
UM, BUT I, I GUESS IT'S A GOOD THING I PULLED THIS AGENDA ITEM 'CAUSE I'M NOT SURE YOU COULD HAVE FIT THAT IN THREE MINUTES.
AND, AND IT'S, IT'S BEEN VERY EXCITING TO, UH, TO WATCH YOU GUYS, UH, GROW AND, AND SEE WHAT YOU'VE DONE.
UM, YOU KNOW, I'VE BEEN TO A NUMBER OF MEETINGS OVER THE, OVER THE YEARS SINCE YOU FIRST STARTED AND SAW YOU BASICALLY STARTED FROM, YOU KNOW, FROM A HANDFUL OF, OF PEOPLE TO, TO, UH, FILLING ENTIRE ROOMS AND NEEDING MORE SPACE.
SO, AND, AND I'VE HEARD MANY STORIES FROM MANY VETERANS ABOUT HOW THEY HAVE BEEN HELPED THROUGH YOUR ORGANIZATION, NOT JUST IN OUR CITY, BUT ACROSS THE REGION AND, AND FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE COUNTRY THAT, UH, HAVE BEEN IN TOUCH WITH YOU BECAUSE YOU GUYS ACTUALLY DO, DO THE WORK AND, AND VETERANS ARE LEARNING THAT THEY CAN COME TO YOU AND GET HELP.
SO I I AM VERY EXCITED THAT, UM, AND I'M HONORED TO BE ABLE TO, IF NOBODY ELSE HAS ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS, I'M GONNA MAKE A MOTION THAT WE AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE LEASE AGREEMENT FOR THE DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS CHAPTER TWO 40 FOR THE USE OF, AND IT IS SHARED NONPROFIT SPACE.
SO YOU GUYS ARE GONNA HAVE OTHER NONPROFITS IN THERE OCCASIONALLY THAT ARE COMING TO USE SPACE.
SO, BUT TO HAVE SPACE AT THE CITY'S NEW FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS FACILITY.
SO WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER, MEMBER CURDY AND A SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN
ALL THOSE, UH, IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.
THANK YOU SO MUCH AND WELCOME.
I JUST WANT TO SAY ONE THING TO THE MAYOR PRO TIM AND THE CITY COUNCIL, I WANT TO INTRODUCE YOU TO THE STATE SENIOR VICE COMMANDER OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, RAMONA ROSS BACON SENIOR VICE COMMAND.
NEXT UP, WE WILL NOT HAVE AGENDA ITEM 10.
THERE'S NO CLOSED SESSION AND THEREFORE THERE'S NO RECONVENE.
SO WE ARE NOW AT AGENDA ITEM 12.
WE WILL, I WILL ENTERTAIN THE MOTION TO ADJOURN.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR COUNCIL MEMBER MCCURDY.
A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MALONE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.